|
Custom Search
| |||
|
|
01-20-2007, 07:35 PM
|
(permalink) |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 25,111
Reputation: 1073638
  |
Well I'd prolly ask Matt Millen that question and then take the one he doesn't say
|
|
|
| Sponsored Advertisement | |
| |
|
|
01-20-2007, 07:52 PM
|
(permalink) |
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,531
Reputation: 992
|
i like them both, but i'd go with jackson.
__________________
|
|
|
|
01-20-2007, 11:28 PM
|
(permalink) |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 246
Reputation: 1345
|
I really like the Mavin Harrison/Steve Smith comparisons. Both are very good receivers. I think I like Jackson a little more. The speed makes him so dynamic. Just wait until he refines his routes, bulks up a little, and gets more repetitions catching the ball. He'll be a great one.
|
|
|
|
|
01-20-2007, 11:33 PM
|
(permalink) |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: why hello...
Posts: 1,514
Reputation: 476
|
I will vote Malcom Kelly
|
|
|
|
|
01-20-2007, 11:51 PM
|
(permalink) | |
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Near the Bay
Posts: 5,946
Reputation: 2559
|
Quote:
__________________
"The liberator who destroys my property, is fighting to save my spirit. The teacher who clears all possessions from my path will set me free."-Tyler Durden |
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2007, 02:14 PM
|
(permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
Reputation:
|
I have to go with Manningham, just because he's a much better route runner than Jackson. Manningham could be the next Marvin Harrison if he gets lucky and gets a good QB throwing to him.
|
|
|
|
01-21-2007, 03:45 PM
|
(permalink) |
|
Moderator
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,423
Reputation: 102758
|
Both have good promise, but with the changes in recent years, I guess I'll vote DeSean's potential here.
|
|
|
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 PM.