I thought it was about as average as a movie could be. The kind where I barely make it to the end and feel absolutely no desire to ever watch it again?
Is it another one of those No Country for Old Men where people like it simply for trying to be different? It just had nothing really going for it? It wasn't funny, it wasn't dramtic, it wasn't heartwrenching, it was just meh?
Ditto. Watchmen was 300 in 2009 for me. So much unrealised potential, the movie itself was solid, but it should and could have been a lot more.
Absolutely no way that I Love You, Man can be ahead of the Hangover. One was the funniest movie I can remember watching in quite some time, the other was a good solid movie.
You also like Public Enemies a lot more than me, thought it was solid but far from great. Certainly not better than Avatar, District 9, Star Trek, Up or The Hangover, just from movies I've seen on that list.
There are a bunch of movies that I need to see that are out at the moment or were out, like half that list I want to but haven't seen.
See, I found it to be all of those things. I loved it. I agree with you on Public Enemies though, it was a huge disappointment for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Bertuzzi
Alright well I decided to go with Adaptation. It had been on my short list for a while and now I regret having put it off for so long. Kaufman is a ******* genius.
You are just realizing this now? The man is a god.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Goosemahn
The APS is strong in this one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by killxswitch
Tears for Fears is better than whatever it is you happen to be thinking about right now.
Speaking of NCFOM I just watched that recently for the first time in ages and loved it even more this time around. The first 20 or so minutes of that movie is mesmerizing.
Ditto. Watchmen was 300 in 2009 for me. So much unrealised potential, the movie itself was solid, but it should and could have been a lot more.
I think too many people are punishing Watchmen and Public Enemies for not living up to their potential. If you just take them for what they are and don't compare them to what they could have been then I think they are both very good movies. I think that if both movies lived up to their potential they could be #1 and #2 on my list.
Quote:
Absolutely no way that I Love You, Man can be ahead of the Hangover. One was the funniest movie I can remember watching in quite some time, the other was a good solid movie.
See that is how I felt. I Love You, Man was one of the funniest movies of the the last few years while the Hangover was just an above average comedy. I know I'm a Paul Rudd fanboy but I enjoyed I Love You, Man much more than the Hangover which was too over-the-top in my opinion. It tried too hard to get laughs by being way too unrealistic.
Quote:
You also like Public Enemies a lot more than me, thought it was solid but far from great. Certainly not better than Avatar, District 9, Star Trek, Up or The Hangover, just from movies I've seen on that list.
I already commented a bit on Public Enemies, so I'll comment on the other movies. Avatar was nothing special as an overall movie. I saw it twice. The first time was in a regular theater and I thought it was horrible. It had every movie cliche imaginable and I knew exactly what was going to happen, just before it happened. I'm glad I ended up going to see it in 3-D because the visuals were everything they were hyped up to be. With that said, visuals can only take a movie so far when then movie severely lacking in story. District 9 was also very overrated to me. What's so special about this movie? Like I said earlier in this thread, if I never see it again then I won't be upset. As far as Star Trek and Up go, I think my 6-11 is pretty interchangeable.
I think too many people are punishing Watchmen and Public Enemies for not living up to their potential. If you just take them for what they are and don't compare them to what they could have been then I think they are both very good movies. I think that if both movies lived up to their potential they could be #1 and #2 on my list.
See that is how I felt. I Love You, Man was one of the funniest movies of the the last few years while the Hangover was just an above average comedy. I know I'm a Paul Rudd fanboy but I enjoyed I Love You, Man much more than the Hangover which was too over-the-top in my opinion. It tried too hard to get laughs by being way too unrealistic.
I already commented a bit on Public Enemies, so I'll comment on the other movies. Avatar was nothing special as an overall movie. I saw it twice. The first time was in a regular theater and I thought it was horrible. It had every movie cliche imaginable and I knew exactly what was going to happen, just before it happened. I'm glad I ended up going to see it in 3-D because the visuals were everything they were hyped up to be. With that said, visuals can only take a movie so far when then movie severely lacking in story. District 9 was also very overrated to me. What's so special about this movie? Like I said earlier in this thread, if I never see it again then I won't be upset. As far as Star Trek and Up go, I think my 6-11 is pretty interchangeable.
Transparency in comedy is one of the most annoying things to me. That's exactly how I see things like Will Ferrel and Dane Cook. **** that ****.
__________________
worker bees can leave
even drones can fly away
the queen is their slave
Location: There's no place I can be since I found Serenity.
Posts: 19,248
Reputation: 1547812
I'm starting round two of this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splat
"Movie ABC's Game"
How to play.
Simply start with the letter “A,” and post the title of one of your favorite movies. The next player posts their favorite movie title beginning with a letter “B.” For instance, post the title “Apocalypse Now.” The next player could post the movie title “Battlefield Earth.”