|
|
| Seattle Seahawks Team Forum Discuss the Seahawks |
03-10-2010, 08:53 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: "I eat quarterbacks." - B.I.
Posts: 9,042
Reputation: 894315
|
If Clausen is there at #6 they have to take him. So all you Clausen-haters or Locker-way-too-early-enthusiasts better pray that Snyder/Shanny take JC at #4.
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
03-11-2010, 12:13 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 864
Reputation: 15399
|
Yeah, honestly I'm starting to expect the pick to be Clausen. Pete Carroll has a love affair with guys he didn't manage to recruit and do well elsewhere. Clausen is one of those guys, so don't be surprised to see him being the pick at 6.
That being the case, then I expect them to go BPA at 14, be that Spiller, Mays, or someone else. Then probably taking a LT in the early second.
I think the biggest problem with our defense is the pass rush. Everyone else looks better if you are able to get to the QB. Course, I still want an upgrade at CB & S, as well as someone who can actually compliment Mebane instead of Cole.
EDIT: At the same time, the thought of drafting Clausen makes me cringe and want to cry at the thought of not even having the possibility of Locker next year...
__________________
Video games keep me sane
University of Washington Huskies: 7-6
|
|
|
03-11-2010, 01:13 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 17,796
Reputation: 1277265
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by summond822
Yeah, honestly I'm starting to expect the pick to be Clausen. Pete Carroll has a love affair with guys he didn't manage to recruit and do well elsewhere. Clausen is one of those guys, so don't be surprised to see him being the pick at 6.
That being the case, then I expect them to go BPA at 14, be that Spiller, Mays, or someone else. Then probably taking a LT in the early second.
I think the biggest problem with our defense is the pass rush. Everyone else looks better if you are able to get to the QB. Course, I still want an upgrade at CB & S, as well as someone who can actually compliment Mebane instead of Cole.
EDIT: At the same time, the thought of drafting Clausen makes me cringe and want to cry at the thought of not even having the possibility of Locker next year...
|
First off there is no proof yet that Pete has a love affair with guys he recruited or even guys who played for him.
I've heard a lot of rumors lately and frankly i dont care for any of them. I dont think you bring in a malcontent like Marshall or an aging QB in his last contract year like McNab. Have minimal interest in Kolb but at what cost.
If they think they can win right away and avoid buiding through the draft the results might be marginal but they arent going to build towards a Superbowl.I'm hoping they pick a Bulaga or a Okung at #6, Mays at #14 and Gerhart in the second. Those guys fill 3 huge needs, are all high character guys and may not be sexy picks but i think the right ones.
|
|
|
03-11-2010, 06:37 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 864
Reputation: 15399
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Babylon
First off there is no proof yet that Pete has a love affair with guys he recruited or even guys who played for him.
|
Have you heard his press conferences when it comes to Clausen and Locker? Two guys that he wanted really badly and missed out on. I've never heard him say a negative word about them. He could just be putting it all behind a mask and really wants to crush them for spurning him, but from what I've seen of Carroll, I'm not sure he's that type of guy.
Quote:
|
I've heard a lot of rumors lately and frankly i dont care for any of them. I dont think you bring in a malcontent like Marshall or an aging QB in his last contract year like McNab. Have minimal interest in Kolb but at what cost.
|
Marshall for at most a 2nd rounder, otherwise pass on him. McNabb is a big no, Kolb for the right price, and two 1st rounders is not the right price, so I don't see that happening.
Quote:
|
If they think they can win right away and avoid buiding through the draft the results might be marginal but they arent going to build towards a Superbowl.I'm hoping they pick a Bulaga or a Okung at #6, Mays at #14 and Gerhart in the second. Those guys fill 3 huge needs, are all high character guys and may not be sexy picks but i think the right ones.
|
I'm not sure high character guys are going to be the way of the Hawks going forward. Also, Mays...to be honest I don't want Mays. I'd rather take Spiller and trade Forsett or Jones. Or if Joe Haden actually did suffer a fall because of his 40 time, Haden>Mays, and it's not even close.
__________________
Video games keep me sane
University of Washington Huskies: 7-6
|
|
|
03-11-2010, 08:37 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 17,796
Reputation: 1277265
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by summond822
Have you heard his press conferences when it comes to Clausen and Locker? Two guys that he wanted really badly and missed out on. I've never heard him say a negative word about them. He could just be putting it all behind a mask and really wants to crush them for spurning him, but from what I've seen of Carroll, I'm not sure he's that type of guy.
Marshall for at most a 2nd rounder, otherwise pass on him. McNabb is a big no, Kolb for the right price, and two 1st rounders is not the right price, so I don't see that happening.
I'm not sure high character guys are going to be the way of the Hawks going forward. Also, Mays...to be honest I don't want Mays. I'd rather take Spiller and trade Forsett or Jones. Or if Joe Haden actually did suffer a fall because of his 40 time, Haden>Mays, and it's not even close.
|
If he drafts Clausen, Mays and Gerhart your theory will be accurate.
|
|
|
03-14-2010, 09:25 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: "I eat quarterbacks." - B.I.
Posts: 9,042
Reputation: 894315
|
So they are seriously willing to part with a 4th rounder for Charlie Whitehurst? Jeez.
|
|
|
03-14-2010, 10:30 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,854
Reputation: 58084
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpngc
So they are seriously willing to part with a 4th rounder for Charlie Whitehurst? Jeez.
|
I really hope not. Can't we just sign say Garcia and not lose a draft pick?
__________________
|
|
|
03-14-2010, 11:16 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 864
Reputation: 15399
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cicero
I really hope not. Can't we just sign say Garcia and not lose a draft pick?
|
How is Whitehurst better than Anderson is what I don't get or any journeyman QB for that matter...at least that way we don't lose anything. Also, isn't Anderson younger and I know he has more game experience...
__________________
Video games keep me sane
University of Washington Huskies: 7-6
|
|
|
03-16-2010, 09:19 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 864
Reputation: 15399
|
Tapp has been traded to Philadelphia for Chris Clemons & a 4th round pick. I'm kind of upset because I really like Tapp, but I admit that I don't really know anything about Clemons though...so hopefully this all works out.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...efensive-ends/
EDIT: Sounds like Clemons is a pass rush specialist who had 8 sacks one year in Oakland.
__________________
Video games keep me sane
University of Washington Huskies: 7-6
Last edited by summond822 : 03-16-2010 at 09:53 PM.
|
|
|
03-17-2010, 02:47 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,854
Reputation: 58084
|
Well it looks like we're getting Whitehurst.
__________________
|
|
|
03-17-2010, 03:00 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 17,796
Reputation: 1277265
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cicero
Well it looks like we're getting Whitehurst.
|
Count me in as less than enthused.
|
|
|
03-17-2010, 03:40 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 864
Reputation: 15399
|
I hate this series of moves...this is what happens when you create a bad front office. There is a reason why the mariners were able to turn it around and why I think the seahawks are going to put is through years of disappointment...
__________________
Video games keep me sane
University of Washington Huskies: 7-6
|
|
|
03-17-2010, 05:55 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: "I eat quarterbacks." - B.I.
Posts: 9,042
Reputation: 894315
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by summond822
I hate this series of moves...this is what happens when you create a bad front office. There is a reason why the mariners were able to turn it around and why I think the seahawks are going to put is through years of disappointment...
|
Eh. I'm not a huge fan of these moves either but I don't think losing an aging safety, a future third, Darryl Tapp, and moving down 20 spots in a deep 2nd round are going to make or break the franchise.
Passing on a franchise QB for an OLB will do that.
The key now is for them to draft well with what they have and pray Whitehurst can be the next Matt Schaub - obviously they feel he can be.
Also, looks like they are shopping Rob Sims because he doesn't fit in Alex Gibbs' system. I'll guess they add another 4th.
So assuming they get that done they'd have....
#6
#14
#60
4th
4th
4th
5th
That's a lot of ammo for wheeling and dealing.
|
|
|
03-17-2010, 07:18 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 864
Reputation: 15399
|
Well my main issue with all of this is losing Tapp who was our best pass rushers last year. He was one of the league leaders in QB pressures. Now if the offenses had been in a position where they needed to throw the ball, he probably would've been one of the league leaders in sacks too.
So in the last two days, we've lost a reliable safety, lost our best pass rusher, lost our valuable early 2nd rounder for a lot less valuable 2nd rounder, lost next years third, gained a 4th, and traded for a QB that isn't going to start this year unless Hasselbeck gets traded/injured.
How am I supposed to be positive about this? It looks like we're rebuilding then we trade away a key part of young defense (Tapp) and add a QB that has 3-5 years before he starts declining. I just don't get where this front office is going...
__________________
Video games keep me sane
University of Washington Huskies: 7-6
|
|
|
03-19-2010, 12:42 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,569
Reputation: -17613
|
Tapp is solid but I don't think he was an elite player by any means.
Here's how I'm looking at this: I think Pete Carroll has a certain plan in place. He's going to ask Aaron Curry to bulk up and play a hybrid DE type of position where he is rushing the passer more than 60% of the time. He could absolutely excel in such a role. I'm certain Carroll has some kind of plan in place; he's a defensive mastermind. Tapp's skillset and weight/height combination simply didn't fit his scheme.
Sure, he probably should have asked for more in return for Tapp, but at least he got a potential starter and a draft pick, no matter how low it is.
|
|
|
03-19-2010, 06:12 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,854
Reputation: 58084
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morton
Tapp is solid but I don't think he was an elite player by any means.
Here's how I'm looking at this: I think Pete Carroll has a certain plan in place. He's going to ask Aaron Curry to bulk up and play a hybrid DE type of position where he is rushing the passer more than 60% of the time. He could absolutely excel in such a role. I'm certain Carroll has some kind of plan in place; he's a defensive mastermind. Tapp's skillset and weight/height combination simply didn't fit his scheme.
Sure, he probably should have asked for more in return for Tapp, but at least he got a potential starter and a draft pick, no matter how low it is.
|
Jackson is only two inches taller than Tapp, they weigh the same, and Tapp is better at everything than Jackson. If Tapp doesn't fit than neither does Jackson. When you say "potential starter," if you're referring to Chris Clemons he is not NFL starting material.
__________________
|
|
|
03-20-2010, 04:11 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seahawks Diaspora
Posts: 3,201
Reputation: 852150
|
I hate trading away draft picks for mediocre players. Hopefully Gerhart is still there at #60.
|
|
|
03-20-2010, 05:19 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 17,796
Reputation: 1277265
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calubflower
I hate trading away draft picks for mediocre players. Hopefully Gerhart is still there at #60.
|
I think as of now the Chargers will probably take him at #40, i wonder who used to have that pick?
|
|
|
03-20-2010, 07:21 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,854
Reputation: 58084
|
I'd rather have Ben Tate than Gerhart anyways and I think he might be there at 60.
__________________
|
|
|
03-26-2010, 11:27 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 318
Reputation: 1794
|
I friend of mine said seattle was talking to Damione lewis DT
|
|
|
03-26-2010, 05:24 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 17,796
Reputation: 1277265
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cicero
I'd rather have Ben Tate than Gerhart anyways and I think he might be there at 60.
|
Tate would be good, doubt Gerhart would be there at #60 so no sense debating that.
|
|
|
04-04-2010, 01:52 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: If you get jammed up don't mention my name
Posts: 10,255
Reputation: 3546174
|
I'm working on my mock and trying to get some insight from the fans. If they address OT at #6, who would be a better pick at #14? JPP or Earl Thomas?
Last edited by TACKLE : 04-04-2010 at 02:25 PM.
|
|
|
04-04-2010, 02:09 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 864
Reputation: 15399
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TACKLE
I'm working on my mock and trying to get some insight from the fans? If they address OT at #6, who would be a better pick at #14? JPP or Earl Thomas.
|
I don't think they could go wrong with either one. Although Carroll has emphasized that they need a pass rush, so I think that JPP is more likely to be the pick there.
__________________
Video games keep me sane
University of Washington Huskies: 7-6
|
|
|
04-05-2010, 12:45 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 864
Reputation: 15399
|
What are the chances that Carroll and Schneider are kicking themselves for pulling the trigger on Whitehurst? I know hindsight is 20-20, but the chances of Clausen dropping to #6 just went way up assuming some team doesn't try to move in front of Seattle to select him.
I have a nasty little feeling we're going to see Clausen drop quite a bit now.
__________________
Video games keep me sane
University of Washington Huskies: 7-6
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 PM.
|