Who should be Number 2?

[Sniper]

Originally Posted by JoeJoeBrown

Which is fine, I don't think Pryor has any business being in the Heisman chase. Also, you are ignoring total performance in the game (70 yds = subpar if you are going to say you are owning someone in a loss vs 233 yds = average in a win.)

You must be fun at parties.

But you're playing the "let's remove the big plays to help my case" argument. Why can't I do the same?

I'm awesome at parties, thank you. It's probably time for you to come up with a new line, though. It's only the 17th time you've used that.

[Sniper]

Originally Posted by keylime_5

taking away 47% of 230 still leaves over 100 yards passing, on a rainy day to boot.

OH MY GOD? 100 yards? Wow. ******* superstar passer over here. Man, what a stud.

Also, no one going around posting Terrelle Pryor>>>>>>>Miami.

Um, considering the fact that every Buckeye fan is using the Miami game as an indicator of Pryor's superior development as a passer and as a reason for his supremacy over the world, it's about the same.

[JoeJoeBrown]

Originally Posted by Sniper

But you're playing the "let's remove the big plays to help my case" argument. Why can't I do the same?

I'm awesome at parties, thank you. It's probably time for you to come up with a new line, though. It's only the 17th time you've used that.

That was the first time I've used that joke. I made fun of you living in your mom's basement before :)

No, I was using the argument "70 yards is pretty damn average, and I agree with others that it looks worse when you take out one long run on an otherwise crappy day."

And stop with the hyperbole, not every Buckeye fan thinks TP is the end all be all. I thought he looked pretty average that day. If Miami DBs had hands, the game might have been a bit scary/bad.

The fact is, TP is an amazing athlete and an OK QB. I actually think Denard has a great short range pass, and a pretty good medium range ball. I will take TP in the bomb department, but it's not far and away.

Running I think Denard is much more dynamic, able to cut up and hit a tiny hole where there shouldn't be one. He can also house it. TP is more of a giant fast guy, someone that I'd rather have on 4th and 1.

Imagine TP and Denard running the wildcat. That would well nigh unstoppable.

[Babylon]

Originally Posted by keylime_5

Oregon has given up like 1000+ yards and 62 points the last two weeks and they should move up in the rankings? If they play a team with a front seven like Alabama's or Ohio State's they won't put up those gaudy offensive stats. I just don't follow the logic and they won't and shouldn't get in the NC game over OSU if both go undefeated I am certain of that.

I hate Oregon but i think beating a top 5 caliber team in Stanford trumps OSU beating Miami.

As for the numbers you can play that game all day and i'm not sure how much it means, Oregon has only given up 75 points all year and teams tend to give up yards in games when 2nd and 3rd stringers are out there.

[JoeJoeBrown]

I'm fine with Oregon being number two.

[wonderbredd24]

Originally Posted by Sniper

Um, considering the fact that every Buckeye fan is using the Miami game as an indicator of Pryor's superior development as a passer and as a reason for his supremacy over the world, it's about the same.

When have you ever seen me praise Pryor as a passer, let alone his development as one?

[keylime_5]

Originally Posted by Sniper

OH MY GOD? 100 yards? Wow. ******* superstar passer over here. Man, what a stud.



Um, considering the fact that every Buckeye fan is using the Miami game as an indicator of Pryor's superior development as a passer and as a reason for his supremacy over the world, it's about the same.

Well 120 yards after you take away 47% isn't bad on a rainy ****** day, especially considering he was trying to throw down field every play since 8 guys were in the box. And people aren't just using the Miami game to show Pryor's progress, they're using every game since January 1st and it's pretty evident.