What is a topic that cause alot of internal debate? - Page 2

njx9 · 03-28-2007, 11:52 PM

also for Denver, DT vs. DE in the draft caused some back and forth. but we tend to be pretty happy people (odd as that may seem).

cutler vs. plummer was a BIG issue on a few other boards last year.

RaiderNation · 03-29-2007, 12:15 AM

for the raiders its randy moss and what to do with the 1st overall pick

yourfavestoner · 03-29-2007, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jag

Well theres really only 3 of us, and we all are Lefty supporters, so no debate there. And everything else we all agree on as well, so there is never any negative spiraling around us.

Jaguars are for lovers.

On this board anyways. The Jaguars.com board is an absolute warzone. People argue over there about everything, but mostly over the quarterback issue.

The Unseen · 03-29-2007, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yourfavestoner

On this board anyways. The Jaguars.com board is an absolute warzone. People argue over there about everything, but mostly over the quarterback issue.

That, and the front office. These talks are mostly propogated by a certain poster who is quite controversial and who's favorite topic is the supposed ineptitude of the Jaguars front office and our FA moves.

Caddy · 03-29-2007, 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by etk

We argue about everything in the Bucs thread, but right now we're focussing on who we should draft if CJ is not available. I like Okoye over any other prospects, but some feel Thomas or Quinn should be the pick (losers:))

We also argue a lot about Simms, and whether or not he is our future starter.

Spot on. The Bucs board has some good, interesting discussions most of the time.

Cough*Joe Thomas*Cough

draftguru151 · 03-29-2007, 07:46 AM

The QB situation for sure.

elway777 · 03-29-2007, 08:10 AM

For Denver probably the Al Wilson trade dilemma.

jkpigskin · 03-29-2007, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elway777

For Denver probably the Al Wilson trade dilemma.

well with bly's new deal, i dont expect him back in denver

neko4 · 03-29-2007, 09:18 PM

For GB:
-Moss and the GB Moral Code
-Brett Favre: Great or Greatest?
-The S Position
-RB
-What to do w/ pick 16 and the rest, but most teams have this debate

03-29-2007, 10:14 PM

For the Yankees- AROD slap
For Jets- Pretty much every draft pick in 20 years
For Celtic FC-1690, Battle of the Boyne

yourfavestoner · 03-29-2007, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Unseen

That, and the front office. These talks are mostly propogated by a certain poster who is quite controversial and who's favorite topic is the supposed ineptitude of the Jaguars front office and our FA moves.

Do not even get me started on that jackass. He's one of the main reasons I left that board. I wasn't even a regular poster there, but it got to the point where I couldn't even stand to go there to read.

Shiver · 03-29-2007, 11:12 PM

What is ironic, I often defend Michael Vick here. Yet, there are such blind Vick fans, not Falcons fans, that I am usually on the other side of the "Vick debates" that proliferate Falcons' forums.

njx9 · 03-29-2007, 11:13 PM

ea would have to have an antithesis. i bet they called you a schaub fanboy and implied your sexuality was in question.

Shiver · 03-29-2007, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by njx9

ea would have to have an antithesis. i bet they called you a schaub fanboy and implied your sexuality was in question.

Actually, you are not far off. They just call me a "hater," because I don't think he's as good as Donovan McNabb, or Carson Palmer, or that I think he needs to progress more. I know how you dislike the "hater" cop-out, trust me, your head would explode at the idiots over there. I take a lot of heat there, because I admit Michael Vick actually has flaws, or things to work on. *gasp*

njx9 · 03-29-2007, 11:17 PM

there're definitely reasons i don't go to many of the donkey fan boards. it's constantly surprising how many disgusting homers exist on those sites.

MP123 · 03-29-2007, 11:19 PM

Whether or not the Packers should get Randy Moss.

villagewarrior · 03-31-2007, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ho0k Em'

Yea, there are some big fans of trading LJ and a few on this site that are agianst it. I know Hermistheman, villagewarrior, and bored of education are ok with it and I think USAF Chief, JHawk, and me are the ones agianst it.

Yeah, LJ is a real combustible element for us.

HawkeyeFan · 03-31-2007, 12:47 PM

For the Rams probably would be Adam Carriker. Some want and some don't, and I don't.

JCutlery · 03-31-2007, 02:02 PM

Al Wilson. And trying to guess what Shanahan has up his sleeve.

bearsfan_51 · 03-31-2007, 02:08 PM

I've give you a clue, his last name rhymes with Frossman.

It was Benson or TJ, but that cleared itself up.

Philliez01 · 03-31-2007, 02:14 PM

The Colts fans really don't debate that much other than if a DT or LB (or something else) is needed. Last year was definitely Maroney vs. Addai on the boards.

ricky bobby · 03-31-2007, 03:39 PM

This must be the therapy thread.

For the Giants it's mostly needs, and what players we should take in the draft. Some guys want Ted Ginn Jr. in round one, which is absurd because we already have Sinorice Moss from last years draft. Some guys want Reggie Nelson, which is just as absurd because we have a pair or young and solid, but not spectacular guys. Some people want Aaron Ross, which i bawk at because he will be a 25 year old rookie. I hate old rookies.