Draft Countdown Forums
Custom Search

Go Back   Draft Countdown Forums > Draft Countdown Forums > Pro Football

Pro Football Discuss professional football.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-27-2012, 05:33 PM    (permalink
njx9
Suck it Metsox
Legend
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,642
Reputation: 4189626
njx9 has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FUNBUNCHER View Post
I still contend Mike Vick's draft year was a fluke. He would not have been the consensus 1/1 pick for every team in the league. Vick was drafted almost strictly on tools and potential, and over a decade later NFL fans are still waiting for him to realize that enormous physical ability.
i fail to see what B has to do with A. he was by a massive margin the most physically gifted qb prospect ever. his arm strength was/is incredible. his speed AND quickness was unmatched by nearly anyone at any position in the league, let alone at qb. every knock on him was something potentially fixable.

Quote:
If you want your QB to lead his position in rushing for most of his career, Vick is your man. But he NEVER developed as a passer until he was released from the Fed and tutored under Andy Reid.
this again has absolutely nothing to do with him as a prospect.

Quote:
IMO Vick would not have been taken before Carson Palmer, Eli, Philip Rivers, Leinart, Cutler, Jamarcus Russell, Stafford, Bradford, Newton, Luck or RGIII if he had been available in the same draft these former 1st rounders were taken.
he would've been taken over every single one on the basis of his potential. matt leinart? really?

Quote:
I tend to believe NFL scouting is more sophisticated than it was in 2001 when it comes to evaluating the QB position.
see: jamarcus russell.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FUNBUNCHER View Post
I'm curious what better 'intangibles' Brees had over Wilson coming out of college.
that was my fault, i was typing too early. i didn't mean intangibles in the standard nfl draft sense, where they're almost 'tangibles' at this point. however, brees was tremendously better in the pocket. yes, wilson is more athletic. but even with, iirc, a far better offensive line, he just wasn't as good at moving within the pocket and relied more on being able to get outside the pocket. brees had better 'zip' on his passes. i don't know if their deep ball arm strength is functionally different, but brees threw a better short ball. i think brees generally did a far better job of reading through progressions, even if they started off simplified in his offense. *shrug*

i should note that none of this is to say that i think wilson is bad or a bust or anything else along those lines. but he was picked in the 4th round for a reason, and to suggest that he was on par with a qb who should've gone in the first (no hindsight, at the time i thought drew brees falling was a travesty, only to see it happen again with rodgers) as a prospect is ridiculous. brees was simply a better prospect.
njx9 is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.