|
|
| 2013 NFL Draft Forum Discuss the 2013 NFL Draft |
11-04-2012, 05:58 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 246
Reputation: 8090
|
QB CLASS: 2013 vs 2012 - Your Verdict?
What's the general opinion here at nfldc on the strength of the '13 qb class vs the '12 qb class?
Who would you say are the franchise qb's of '13? Any potential Russell Wilson type steals?
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
11-04-2012, 06:03 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,366
Reputation: 97313
|
Luck + RGIII >>>>>>>> entire '13 class.
I don't see a "franchise" QB in this draft maybe Geno.
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 06:57 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
2011 SWDC Mock Draft Champ
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: <3 cutty <3
Posts: 2,232
Reputation: 719250
|
2012 already looks like one of the best ever. 2013 sucks.
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 07:21 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Green Bay , WI
Posts: 5,515
Reputation: 89716
|
Isn't Matt Barkley a franchise QB?
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 07:47 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 6,271
Reputation: 412128
|
2012. I don't even think there is a debate.
__________________

Sig by BoneKrusher
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 07:52 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: anaheim - home of the...ducks?
Posts: 9,924
Reputation: 286460
|
Hindsight is 20/20. Find me one person who knew Ryan tannehill would be putting up these kind of numbers and ill find you a liar.
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 08:01 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,538
Reputation: 306170
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by soybean
Hindsight is 20/20. Find me one person who knew Ryan tannehill would be putting up these kind of numbers and ill find you a liar.
|
Tannehill's success doesn't even matter here, IMO. Luck and RG3 are enough to say that this class will be light years better than next years. A better comparison would be the 2011 QB class to the 2013 class.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJSchneider
If Te'o fell to us, I would wet my pants. If we then passed on him, I would poop said pants.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrdrylie
At your age, you'll probably poop and pee your paints on draft night regardless of whom the Saints Draft.
|
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 08:05 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
SWDC Mafia
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: You can call me Jooby Guverse
Posts: 23,980
Reputation: 5891600
|
I think Geno and Tyler Wilson are going to be franchise guys, but yeah, 2012 > 2013 and it isn't close.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caddy
I want to be Vidae.
|
Quote:
<@vidae> Bomer is like an angel
<@DG> angels wish
|
Quote:
<@vidae> D:
<@comahan> D:
|
** RIP themaninblack. You will be missed. **
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 08:11 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: anaheim - home of the...ducks?
Posts: 9,924
Reputation: 286460
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by farfromforgotten
Tannehill's success doesn't even matter here, IMO. Luck and RG3 are enough to say that this class will be light years better than next years. A better comparison would be the 2011 QB class to the 2013 class.
|
I think geno will be rated similarly to rg3 when all is said and done. No one compares to luck. And I think Tyler Wilson will be good.
Not sure if bray will come out and no idea about Barkley.
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 08:13 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sean Mannion Bandwagon
Posts: 3,392
Reputation: 301793
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by soybean
Hindsight is 20/20. Find me one person who knew Ryan tannehill would be putting up these kind of numbers and ill find you a liar.
|
I didn't think Tannehill would be so good so fast but I was one of his biggest supporters.
2012 is much better than 2013.
Barkley did show more than enough arm strength and deep ball accuracy yesterday though to leave me impressed. Smith's stock should be falling - very overrated.
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 08:15 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,847
Reputation: 24524
|
Zac Dysert may have a shot to be number one quarterback for 2013. Pathetic. 2012 all the way.
__________________
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 08:40 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,847
Reputation: 24524
|
I know few teams will forcefully draft a quarterback with many ?s in the first round because of media and society's hypes but which one first round will 2013 be comparable to?
2000: first quarterback taken in 18th.
1997: first quarterback taken in 26th.
1996: None taken in the first round.
__________________
Last edited by YotoJets007 : 11-04-2012 at 09:06 PM.
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 08:47 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sean Mannion Bandwagon
Posts: 3,392
Reputation: 301793
|
Wasn't Matt Ryan the 3rd overall pick in 2008?
I think Barkley/Smith/Wilson all end up being first round guys. One of them is going to go really high to the Chiefs. Browns might draft one too.
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 09:05 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,847
Reputation: 24524
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolidGold
Wasn't Matt Ryan the 3rd overall pick in 2008?
I think Barkley/Smith/Wilson all end up being first round guys. One of them is going to go really high to the Chiefs. Browns might draft one too.
|
2000... sorry..
__________________
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 09:08 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,159
Reputation: 209182
|
Andrew Luck > 2013
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 49erNation85
I dunno even half of those guys why did we sign them jeez.
|
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 01:29 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Athens, Ga.
Posts: 4,240
Reputation: 243647
|
Responses are predictable. Many people on these boards are down on every QB class prior to the respective Draft. Now they conveniently forget they were down on every QB not named Luck or Griffin.
__________________
What?
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 01:53 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,512
Reputation: 456105
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halsey
Responses are predictable. Many people on these boards are down on every QB class prior to the respective Draft. Now they conveniently forget they were down on every QB not named Luck or Griffin.
|
LMAO, that's two pretty big omissions.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNIPER26
fwiw, i amz deunks ofs myt ass. ilo vez drinmoinz befotre i post. wha t a hreat ideas.z.
|
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 03:32 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boxscorescouting.com
Posts: 4,922
Reputation: 1065669
|
As everyone has said it's 2012 and it's not even close.
Luck is the best prospect I can remember at the position. I'm not sure I would bet right now on consistent, long term success for RG3 (I don't like QBs who get hit that much and also believe to be great you need to be able to consistently pass from the pocket without gimmicks) however right now he is lighting the league up. Tannehill is a guy who I think can be a star as well and both Russell Wilson and Brandon Weeden can be serviceable starters IMO.
In this year's class I see Geno Smith, Matt Barkley and Tyler Wilson as possible franchise QBs. If I was being honest though I would say that the ceiling I see with all of these guys is a serviceable starter or slightly better than average (think someone like Philip Rivers right now, not 3 years ago). The depth in this year's class is pretty good though.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 09:39 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sean Mannion Bandwagon
Posts: 3,392
Reputation: 301793
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halsey
Responses are predictable. Many people on these boards are down on every QB class prior to the respective Draft. Now they conveniently forget they were down on every QB not named Luck or Griffin.
|
I wasn't!! Loved Tannehill coming out (I liked him more than Griffin who I feel has just been a beneficiary of alot of hype) too just didn't think he was going to be this good so quickly.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 01:11 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 439
Reputation: 527959
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by soybean
Hindsight is 20/20. Find me one person who knew Ryan tannehill would be putting up these kind of numbers and ill find you a liar.
|
I didn't quite expect THIS from him but I had him as the #2 QB and the fourth overall player in last year's draft. And I consistently made the argument that you CAN win with him in his rookie year. I just wasnt expecting 300 yard days and so much consistency week to week.
Last edited by y.f.s. : 11-05-2012 at 01:14 PM.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 01:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
SWDC Mafia
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: You can call me Jooby Guverse
Posts: 23,980
Reputation: 5891600
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by y.f.s.
I didn't quite expect THIS from him but I had him as the #2 QB and the fourth overall player in last year's draft. And I consistently made the argument that you CAN win with him in his rookie year. I just wasnt expecting 300 yard days and so much consistency week to week.
|
I can confirm this. yfs and I watched damn near every A&M together in IRC and we both loved Tannehill more than most. God I wanted him in KC so bad. Mehhh.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caddy
I want to be Vidae.
|
Quote:
<@vidae> Bomer is like an angel
<@DG> angels wish
|
Quote:
<@vidae> D:
<@comahan> D:
|
** RIP themaninblack. You will be missed. **
|
|
|
11-06-2012, 10:43 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 2nd deck at Stanford Stadium
Posts: 5,836
Reputation: 946393
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Menardo75
Andrew Luck > 2013
|
This. Just Luck is considerably better than the 2013.
__________________
90 min of Luck's 2012 throws.
Quote:
Originally Posted by descendency
Blaine Gabbert should never be a DE, because he has no idea what a real QB is thinking.
|
|
|
|
11-06-2012, 11:19 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,230
Reputation: 766274
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by y.f.s.
I didn't quite expect THIS from him but I had him as the #2 QB and the fourth overall player in last year's draft. And I consistently made the argument that you CAN win with him in his rookie year. I just wasnt expecting 300 yard days and so much consistency week to week.
|
I'm curious as to what your problem with Griffin was/is if you had him at best 5th overall
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 01:52 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 439
Reputation: 527959
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mufasa
I'm curious as to what your problem with Griffin was/is if you had him at best 5th overall
|
I thought RG3 had a tendency to get frenetic and awkward when things broke down around him and the pocket got muddy. And that he exposed himself to a lot of big hits.
Not like I still didn't love the dude, I just thought Tannehill's skills in terms of the craft of playing QB were borderline prodigious for someone with so few starts. Not to mention, he was just as physically talented as the other two (and I think his arm was better than Luck's and just as good if not better than RG3's. Those repeated outbreaking routes to the far hash were no joke, and he did them over and over at A&M like it was nothing.).
Basically, I thought he was the QB that everybody wanted Jake Locker to be soooo bad. You could just see how massive a difference there was in terms of translatable skills between Tannehill and a guy like Sanchez - a guy with roughly the same amount of starts and way more "quality wins."
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 09:26 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 582
Reputation: 21641
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by soybean
Hindsight is 20/20. Find me one person who knew Ryan tannehill would be putting up these kind of numbers and ill find you a liar.
|
Gil Brandt had an article on him last year. I took him seriously because he knows a lot more about college prospects than any of us do.
http://nfldraftjones.blogspot.com/p/...012-draft.html
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM.
|