Who is the current OROTY? - Page 20

jsagan77 · 12-11-2012, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OSUGiants17

By far the best post you ever made. And one day you'll see a girl naked in real life and it will be fantastic. Of course she won't be of this caliber but hey, fat chicks and ugly girls need love too and I'm sure they'll love you for your witty personality and GIF laying ability.

Caulibflower · 12-11-2012, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsagan77

...GIF laying ability.

killxswitch · 12-11-2012, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsagan77

I don't know why simple math is so difficult to comprehend but here goes nothing. Since RG3 throws less passes than Luck you have to use a ratio to determine drop rate. Do the math, then get back to me.

Wait, context of stats matters? But only when it props up RG3, right, I forgot.

jsagan77 · 12-11-2012, 01:23 PM

Pretty telling stuff right there. I would plus rep you but I've been rep raped by the dregs of the board.

Quote:

Originally Posted by xooberon

Just to get this thread back on track, here is how RGIII and Luck (and Wilson) are stacking up metric wise (this is obviously just raw data and has to be properly contextualized):

Drop % (% of pass att that are dropped): RGIII - 8.5, Luck - 7.3, Wilson - 5.5

Accuracy % (what completion% would look like when drops, spikes, throw aways etc aren't factored in): RGIII - 79.7, Wilson - 75.1, Luck - 67.1

YIA% (% of yards that come before the catch): Luck - 64.0, Wilson - 62.9, RGIII - 53.6

Deep Passing Acc % (completion % (including drops) of balls thrown for 20 yards or more): RGIII - 51.6, Wilson - 46.4, Luck - 41.8 [Important to note that RGIII attempts deep throws about half as much as Wilson and Luck]

Pressure % (% of dropbacks under pressure): Wilson - 39.0, Luck - 38.1, RGIII - 36.3

Completion % Under Pressure: RGIII - 59.2, Wilson - 44.2, Luck - 41.7

Accuracy % Under Pressure: RGIII - 78.2, Wilson - 63.9, Luck - 54.5

Source: PFF

jsagan77 · 12-11-2012, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by killxswitch

Wait, context of stats matters? But only when it props up RG3, right, I forgot.

Haha first off it's not adding context, it's just simply logical. And find a stat that discredits him--The Luck camp are the ones who need to contextualize stats in order to make Luck look better than he's been.

killxswitch · 12-11-2012, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsagan77

Haha first off it's not adding context, it's just simply logical. And find a stat that discredits him--The Luck camp are the ones who need to contextualize stats in order to make Luck look better than he's been.

A mod should change your username to sbayless77. Do you even believe the crap you write?

jsagan77 · 12-11-2012, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by killxswitch

A mod should change your username to sbayless77. Do you even believe the crap you write?

You think It's comtext I think it's obvious for all situations involving numbers. I guess if you don't think that way it's contextual in nature but to me it's simple logic.

killxswitch · 12-11-2012, 01:40 PM

Sorry I don't know what comtext is, professor.

Jvig43 · 12-11-2012, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsagan77

You think It's comtext I think it's obvious for all situations involving numbers. I guess if you don't think that way it's contextual in nature but to me it's simple logic.

Is this some sort of cable provider professor?

jsagan77 · 12-11-2012, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jvig43

Is this some sort of cable provider professor?

Im on a phone tard.

killxswitch · 12-11-2012, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsagan77

Im a tard on a phone.

This is your most honest post in this thread so far.

jsagan77 · 12-11-2012, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by killxswitch

This is your most honest post in this thread so far.

And it's still better than anything you've ever contributed to this board. (shocker)

OSUGiants17 · 12-11-2012, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsagan77

By far the best post you ever made. And one day you'll see a girl naked in real life and it will be fantastic. Of course she won't be of this caliber but hey, fat chicks and ugly girls need love too and I'm sure they'll love you for your witty personality and GIF laying ability.

I've seen your mother naked and by god it was glorious!

jsagan77 · 12-11-2012, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OSUGiants17

I've seen your mother naked and by god it was glorious!

You'e obviously never seen my mom naked if it was 'glorious'. Oh wait I forgot who I'm talking to, it probably was.

Lol I can't believe I've sunk to arguing with teenagers. Tell mom and dad hello when you go upstairs after your weed and taco bell coma. What can I say, being successful in life isn't for everyone I guess.

LonghornsLegend · 12-11-2012, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsagan77

What can I say, being successful in life isn't for everyone I guess.

Says the guy who has complained about his rep over 10 times. At least you have your priorities in life lined up.

brat316 · 12-11-2012, 02:21 PM

LaMichael James should win it.

killxswitch · 12-11-2012, 02:24 PM

So when does Skip Bayless get banned for being a troll?

Bengalsrocket · 12-11-2012, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsagan77

You'e obviously never seen my mom naked if it was 'glorious'. Oh wait I forgot who I'm talking to, it probably was.

Lol I can't believe I've sunk to arguing with teenagers. Tell mom and dad hello when you go upstairs after your weed and taco bell coma. What can I say, being successful in life isn't for everyone I guess.

You've wasted a more time posting than anyone here. Stop insulting everyone and go get a breath of fresh air.

AntoinCD · 12-11-2012, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsagan77

What can I say, being successful in life isn't for everyone I guess.

Man, don't get me started with these guys. I mean I have a tv and a microwave in my house yet not once has anyone given me plus rep for it

Rosebud · 12-11-2012, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FUNBUNCHER

Yeah but it's 10x easier to earn a permanent room in a lockdown psychiatric facility by attempting to prove this hypothesis. If one's brain chemistry is particularly predisposed, LSD can trigger permanent schizo-effective disorder.

Death is relative.
Living without one's sanity is not what I would call being 'alive'.

If you're schizophrenic already, then yes, LSD can **** you up real good, but that's a tiny portion of the population. It's actually far more likely for someone to develop horrible alcoholism that destroys their lives and minds, leaving them in that same psychiatric facility...not that I don't enjoy a good reminiscing-sess, but why are we talking about acid?

jsagan77 · 12-11-2012, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bengalsrocket

You've wasted a more time posting than anyone here. Stop insulting everyone and go get a breath of fresh air.

Yeah cause it's just me. The ignorance and stupidity of accusing one person (who's mostly just in retaliation mode) is just astonishing.

scottyboy · 12-11-2012, 02:41 PM

jsagan is the funniest person here.

or saddest.

if he's a doctoral candidate, I fear for our education system.

Despite people giving valid arguments against him, he ignores them, calls everyone else idiots, belittles everyone who disagrees with him and continues to babble on.

classic internet.

scottyboy · 12-11-2012, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsagan77

Yeah cause it's just me. The ignorance and stupidity of accusing one person (who's mostly just in retaliation mode) is just astonishing.

your ignoring of cudders' post with a counterargument was literally the biggest insult and act of ignorance you could've possibly do and if offended me. So, yeah, there's that.

Everything else has just been how we handle trolls here: by mocking them to make ourselves feel better about ourselves and posting .gifs and pictures of tits and memes.

And talking about acid.

Seriously, get better insults. Saying we should OD on acid...that's the worst insult I've heard in quite some time.

Caulibflower · 12-11-2012, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottyboy

jsagan is the funniest person here.

or saddest.

if he's a doctoral candidate, I fear for our education system.

Despite people giving valid arguments against him, he ignores them, calls everyone else idiots, belittles everyone who disagrees with him and continues to babble on.

classic internet.

Classic academia, too. Part of the reason I'm half-inclined to believe him.

The other thought I had is that he's a 17 year-old kid who's in Honors English and thinks that means he'll be able to pass himself off as a "PhD candidate" online.

Either way, he's come into full bloom as a troll in this thread and I'm glad I can refer to someone as "Dr. Sagan" again.

jsagan77 · 12-11-2012, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottyboy

jsagan is the funniest person here.

or saddest.

if he's a doctoral candidate, I fear for our education system.

Despite people giving valid arguments against him, he ignores them, calls everyone else idiots, belittles everyone who disagrees with him and continues to babble on.

classic internet.

Subjective analysis w/o taking in all the facts is not a good argument in any community. Except this one. It's obvious that there are 3 parties here. One that watches Luck extensively and bits and pieces of RG3, the coverse, and ones that see the
holistic picture. It's funny how all these good posts are on here about Luck but none for RG3. Standard I guess.