Poll: Rookie of the Year (week 16)

[tmljeh19]

Originally Posted by MaxV

I don't think this one counts as comeback.

Chiefs never led.

Im sorry Ill correct myself. Another thrilling victory over a sub .500 team. Yawn!!!

[njx9]

Originally Posted by tmljeh19

Im sorry Ill correct myself. Another thrilling victory over a sub .500 team. Yawn!!!

right? if only these crappy rookie qbs would stop playing garbage teams and only winning by a touchdown.

[MaxV]

Originally Posted by tmljeh19

Im sorry Ill correct myself. Another thrilling victory over a sub .500 team. Yawn!!!

You are right.

Another one.

Just like that 18-point comeback vs. medicore 2-2 Packers. Yawn!!!

[tmljeh19]

Originally Posted by MaxV

You are right.

Another one.

Just like that 18-point comeback vs. medicore 2-2 Packers. Yawn!!!

Im sorry they only beat ONE decent team.

I love how you guys cite the ONLY game they beat a team better then them. I love it :)

[tmljeh19]

Originally Posted by njx9

right? if only these crappy rookie qbs would stop playing garbage teams and only winning by a touchdown.

You fail to see the big picture. So just stop while you are very far behind.

And please dont compare the Chiefs to the Eagles. It makes you look even more clueless.

[xjxdarren]

Originally Posted by tmljeh19

Im sorry they only beat ONE decent team.

Sincere appreciation for reminding me that Minnesota is a horrible team without redemption.

[xjxdarren]

Originally Posted by tmljeh19

You fail to see the big picture. So just stop while you are very far behind.

Speaking of falling behind, I may be seeing a very lengthy red bar underneath someone's profile picture.

[tmljeh19]

Originally Posted by xjxdarren

Speaking of falling behind, I may be seeing a very lengthy red bar underneath someone's profile picture.

OH NO!!! Whatever shall I do with a neg rep??? The horror!!! Get a life lol

[MaxV]

Originally Posted by tmljeh19

Im sorry they only beat ONE decent team.

I love how you guys cite the ONLY game they beat a team better then them. I love it :)

They beat teams that were put in front of them. Just like the Skins.

Washington's wins haven't exactly been eye-popping. Ravens, Giants and Cowboys are quality, but not spectacular.

Skins also beat the Vikings, but so did the Colts.

[cmarq83]

Originally Posted by tmljeh19

You fail to see the big picture. So just stop while you are very far behind.

And please dont compare the Chiefs to the Eagles. It makes you look even more clueless.

Yes, because a talented team starting a bad QB with horrible management that has lost the vast majority of its games is much different than a talented team starting a bad QB with horrible management that has lost the vast majority of its games.

[xjxdarren]

Originally Posted by tmljeh19

OH NO!!! Whatever shall I do with a neg rep??? The horror!!! Get a life lol

A life where notoriety is glorified? C'mom you know you are way better at that than me, don't be moderate dude.

[tmljeh19]

Originally Posted by xjxdarren

Sincere appreciation for reminding me that Minnesota is a horrible team without redemption.

Ok so what do you call getting stomped by all of you quality opponents dating back to week 2 and 5? Its been 11 weeks since they beat a team thats actually any good. That means nothing right?

[xjxdarren]

Originally Posted by tmljeh19

Ok so what do you call getting stomped by all of you quality opponents dating back to week 2 and 5? Its been 11 weeks since they beat a team thats actually any good. That means nothing right?

By your genius logic I guess I could just scrap off the week one loss and pretend colts went 4 and 0 and obliterated one of the league's best divisions in the NFC North right? That's so damn smart much thanks again!

[tmljeh19]

Originally Posted by MaxV

They beat teams that were put in front of them. Just like the Skins.

Washington's wins haven't exactly been eye-popping. Ravens, Giants and Cowboys are quality, but not spectacular.

Skins also beat the Vikings, but so did the Colts.

So beating the Giants, Ravens, and Cowboys is equal to beating the Chiefs, Titans and Lions?

[tmljeh19]

Originally Posted by xjxdarren

By your genius logic I guess I could just scrap off the week one loss and pretend colts went 4 and 0 and obliterated one of the league's best divisions in the NFC North right? That's so damn smart much thanks again!

Again you avoid my question. Having not beaten a quality team in 11 weeks means nothing? Losing to the Texans, getting an beat down by NE and getting owned by the freaking pathetic Jets.

And how the hell am I changing outcomes of games with my argument? How does that have anything to do with not beating a good team in 11 weeks?

[MaxV]

Originally Posted by tmljeh19

So beating the Giants, Ravens, and Cowboys is equal to beating the Chiefs, Titans and Lions?

4 of their wins have come against Eagles (twice), Bucs and Browns.

So don't act as if they had to run this impossible gauntlet of a schedule to get to this point.

[xjxdarren]

Originally Posted by tmljeh19

Again you avoid my question. Having not beaten a quality team in 11 weeks means nothing? Losing to the Texans, getting an beat down by NE and getting owned by the freaking pathetic Jets.

At what point did I explicit say I was going to answer your question? Don't flatter yourself bro. Answering first requires recognition of the validity of the aforementioned questioning, which I found beyond non- existent. So therefore..

[falloutboy14]

Originally Posted by tmljeh19

So beating the Giants, Ravens, and Cowboys is equal to beating the Chiefs, Titans and Lions?

Packers > Giants, Ravens, Cowboys.

[MaxV]

I think both Skins are Colts won games that they should have.

And maybe a couple that they shouldn't have.

[xjxdarren]

Originally Posted by falloutboy14

Packers > Giants, Ravens, Cowboys.

Once again, some people just tend to think by piling up 10 Hondas it becomes more valuable than a Bugatti Veyron.

[tmljeh19]

Originally Posted by MaxV

4 of their wins have come against Eagles (twice), Bucs and Browns.

So don't act as if they had to run this impossible gauntlet of a schedule to get to this point.

Colts 10 wins opponents record: 55-95
Redskins 9 wins opponents record: 61-74

FOURTY more losses then wins for Colts opponents
13 more losses then wins for Redskins opponents

/discussion. Thanks for playing :)

[xooberon]

I hate it when people only give QB's credit for wins. That Green Bay game had far more to do with Reggie Wayne than Andrew Luck.

[tmljeh19]

Originally Posted by xjxdarren

At what point did I explicit say I was going to answer your question? Don't flatter yourself bro. Answering first requires recognition of the validity of the aforementioned questioning, which I found beyond non- existent. So therefore..

And again you ignore the point I made when I said since when did I ever say that flipping W/L is valid?

I understand. Don't answer questions or points that make you look clueless.

[tmljeh19]

Originally Posted by xooberon

I hate it when people only give QB's credit for wins. That Green Bay game had far more to do with Reggie Wayne than Andrew Luck.

OOMMMGGGGZZZZZ NOOOOOOO!!!!! You cant say that stuff here!!!!!!

[xjxdarren]

Originally Posted by tmljeh19

And again you ignore the point I made when I said since when did I ever say that flipping W/L is valid?

I understand. Don't answer questions or points that make you look clueless.

How's diminishing the significance of early wins not equal to altering the actual outcome? Please elaborate omniscient professor?!

Now I see why Obama doesn't get into a debate with you, because you make look clueless! Pardon my lack of manner Mr. Nobel laureate.