12/23 - Holiday Podcast: Presents For Every NFL Team

Scott Wright · 12-23-2012, 10:42 AM

We're taping a new podcast on Sunday, December 23 at 8:00pm EST.

This will be our special holiday show in which we give a prospect present to each team.

Should be a lot of fun so be sure to listen live or download / stream it afterwards!

Draft Countdown Podcast
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/DraftCountdown

Note: You can stream the archive afterwards at the link above or download it on iTunes.

Scott Wright · 12-23-2012, 08:14 PM

This show is available to download on iTunes or to download / stream it at Blog Talk Radio.

Splat · 12-23-2012, 08:33 PM

If the Chiefs present isn't a QB I'm taking it back to the store.

PossibleCabbage · 12-25-2012, 03:13 PM

I'm pretty sure taking Bernard where he could be had (late in the first) would be a terrible decision by Green Bay. It's like when New Orleans took Mark Ingram late in the first and then didn't have very many carries to give him (because you'd rather have the ball in Drew Brees's hands anyway), except that Bernard is nowhere near as good a prospect as Ingram was.

Before concluding that Green Bay desperately needs an RB, I would pay attention to how they play in the next few weeks with a more physical center, now that Jeff Saturday has been benched. Per ProFootball Focus Saturday graded out as the worst run-blocking center in the NFL. I'm not so sure that the way to fix the Green Bay running game isn't "better play at C" rather than "take an RB high."

But since it's a present, I'll take it, but I'd much rather them take him in the second than the first. I'm not sure if you gave Green Bay the second coming of Adrian Peterson they'd use him much.

vidae · 12-25-2012, 04:56 PM

Yay, Tyler Wilson. <3 you Shane.

PossibleCabbage · 12-25-2012, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vidae

Yay, Tyler Wilson. <3 you Shane.

I really have no problem with the Chiefs taking a QB high in round 2, except that I have no idea who they would take at the top of round 1 if not a quarterback.

I was confused when Shane implied that Geno Smith was a QB that was worth it for the Raiders to build around, but not a QB that was worth it for the Chiefs to built around. If nothing else, the Chiefs need a QB more than the Raiders do, since the Raiders need everything.

vidae · 12-25-2012, 09:12 PM

I just ignored every time either of them said "value" and instead assumed he was taken first overall. That made me happy.

Shane P. Hallam · 12-25-2012, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PossibleCabbage

I really have no problem with the Chiefs taking a QB high in round 2, except that I have no idea who they would take at the top of round 1 if not a quarterback.

I was confused when Shane implied that Geno Smith was a QB that was worth it for the Raiders to build around, but not a QB that was worth it for the Chiefs to built around. If nothing else, the Chiefs need a QB more than the Raiders do, since the Raiders need everything.

I think Geno is who the Chiefs SHOULD take and can be built around with the right coaching.

Abaddon · 12-28-2012, 02:25 AM

Shame on you for giving Oakland a QB. I fart in your general direction.

Caulibflower · 12-28-2012, 02:32 AM

It just occurred to me than Glennon could be perfect for Oakland. Haven't listened to the podcast, so I don't know if that's what Abaddon is referring to, but imagining Glennon in silver and black felt like an epiphany.