Originally Posted by Shupp
In case reading comp isn't your thing, I stated that Goldson IS (100% imo) a top 10 FS. Then I added that you "might" (>.001% chance) have a hard time naming 10 safeties (SS included) better than Goldson. That is not synonymous with a statement that I think he is a top 10 overall safety. Equivocation on your part sir.
Oh hey good one. Shupp clearly won this one. Because reading comprehension isn't my thing.
Except... I did address "naming 10 safeties better than Goldson." That's exactly what I did.
There. And it wasn't hard either.