|
|
| Pro Football Discuss professional football. |
11-02-2006, 07:04 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Icon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: :3
Posts: 17,552
Reputation: 466188
|
Fitz, but Boldin can't be overlooked. He's a great player in his own right.
__________________

by BoneKrusher
Quote:
|
<TheUnseen> Drunken Canadian Bastard: There's an APS for that
|
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
11-02-2006, 07:32 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UCONN
Posts: 1,919
Reputation: 33913
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 7-11
maybe hes talking about playing him on both sides of the ball, he just ight be that good.
|
I could see Boldin playing safety. but as far as reciever goes boldin is better right now imo. i think he's underated when it comes to making big plays.
__________________
The way it is
GamerTag : GrubbyPaws (Halo 3, NCAA 09, Madden 09)
|
|
|
11-02-2006, 07:41 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
In response to who is the better receiver, they're completely different types, and I'd think it's fair to say that they're about even right now. Fitzgerald has more upside; he has the tools to become one of the best ever. I'll take him.
But Marques Colston is like a combination of both... the hands of Fitzgerald and the after catch ability of Boldin. :P
|
|
|
|
11-02-2006, 08:34 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 993
Reputation: 1096
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Denver Bronco56
bolden with out a doubt....he is like a power HB when he catches the ball...he breaks dbs down and has great hands, size
|
Yeah I'd take Boldin, he's just amazing running after the catch.
|
|
|
11-02-2006, 08:35 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Powder Blue=The manliest color of them all
Posts: 3,393
Reputation: 15
|
FitzG hands down
__________________

Sig by Darnik44two
Lord Favre Is Immortal
|
|
|
11-02-2006, 09:04 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
:/
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: RAWR
Posts: 37,123
Reputation: 2171333
|
It really sucks that Larry got hurt because it delayed him being the best WR in the league. I would take Fitz every day of the week. Boldin is great, but Fitz is something special.
__________________

<Gaius_Baltar> That is correct comahan
<vidae> I ******* LOVE YOU DG
<njx9> <3 dg
|
|
|
11-02-2006, 10:30 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,405
Reputation: -62345
|
Bolden has out produced Fitz since he was a rookie.. I know you are thinking that last years stats, Fitz's are better but Bolden missed a couple games..
|
|
|
11-02-2006, 10:38 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tallahassee FL
Posts: 1,877
Reputation: 31327
|
almost impossible to choose, both are really amazing a bring something different. I'll go with Boldin because im an FSU fan and he's been dominant before Fitz came along, and he is so fun to watch with the way he just punishes DB's.
|
|
|
11-03-2006, 01:56 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Back to back to back winning seasons ftw
Posts: 6,975
Reputation: 64327
|
Boldin. He is so consistent. Fastest reciever to get to 300 catches. Pretty amazing stuff.
__________________
"He's the leader of the next great class of NFL players. " - John Elway on Matt Ryan
|
|
|
11-03-2006, 05:24 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
All-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,595
Reputation: 5546
|
Boldin. He has insane run power and has great hands.
|
|
|
11-03-2006, 05:37 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 382
Reputation: 10
|
Fitz barely. I want both.
It's shocking how bad Zona is with such badass receivers.
__________________
"I'm going for 2,200 (yards) next year," Gore said. "That's the record, isn't it? Yeah, I'll get that."
|
|
|
11-03-2006, 07:08 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Icon
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Aussie-Land
Posts: 18,963
Reputation: 1857320
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jackalope
i'd take Fitzgerald. i think he'll be better in the long run.
|
|
|
|
11-03-2006, 07:42 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 12,051
Reputation: 185507
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 16_SFfan_80
Fitz barely. I want both.
It's shocking how bad Zona is with such badass receivers.
|
It shows just how important O-Line to the team's success.
__________________

Sig by Primetime21
|
|
|
11-03-2006, 09:01 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Not Oakland, CA
Posts: 19,697
Reputation: 1290544
|
Re: Fitzgerald or Boldin
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Space Ghost
So, the question is who is the better receiver and who would you rather have on your team.
Personally, I think Boldin is ahead of Fitzgerald by a long shot right now. More consistent and even though he is older he probably doesn't have much more experience as a wide receiver than Fitzgerald.
again; who is the better receiver and who would you rather have on your team.
|
I'll take both. They're joined at the hip--Siamiese twin you know?
__________________

Oldie but a goodie.
|
|
|
11-03-2006, 09:24 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,430
Reputation: 8007
|
i would take boldin cuz i believe that he is a more complete WR. boldin blocks better than larry and is not afraid to run the under/in/quick slant route which scares many receivers.
__________________
|
|
|
11-03-2006, 09:36 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 11,916
Reputation: 141307
|
At the moment, Bolding is the better receiver, and I'd take him on my team.
__________________
Ohio State Buckeyes Duke Blue Devils New York Jets St. Louis Cardinals San Jose Sharks Seattle Sonics
|
|
|
11-03-2006, 08:59 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Posts: 3,519
Reputation: 105
|
Anquan Boldin is the hardest WR to tackle in the NFL. Yes even over TO(coming from a dallas fan)
__________________
|
|
|
11-03-2006, 09:02 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 16_SFfan_80
Fitz barely. I want both.
It's shocking how bad Zona is with such badass receivers.
|
Not really. :?
|
|
|
|
11-03-2006, 09:06 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,846
Reputation: 1892
|
Ill take Boldin. He seems to get better separation, Fitz uses his body and length to get to the ball but there is someone usually right on his back. Also impressive is that Boldin was doing this before Fitz got there.
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 02:45 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
id prally have to choose anquan i shoulda went bowlin.. haha no im just kidding cardinals fans id take fitzgerald in a heartbeat
|
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 01:53 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 126
Reputation: 10
|
Larry. I think... :|
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 01:55 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bulimia twice the taste less calories
Posts: 3,467
Reputation: 49
|
I like them both but I like Fitz's hands more better so I'll take Fitz.
__________________
Thanks to jackalope
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 02:07 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 195
Reputation: 112
|
Boldin. The only player more physical than Quan is Hines Ward. I think that he's more of a go to guy than Fitzgerald. I think Fitz isn't as consistent, but really you couldn't go wrong with either.
__________________
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 02:12 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,490
Reputation: 27
|
I think that Fitzgerald does more for my team as a receiver, but Boldin would do more as a football player. Boldin is one of the best blockers at receiver in the NFL, even though he's overshadowed. He's also more dangerous after the catch.
Right now I'd take Boldin, but god damn give me either one.
__________________
Designs by Thule
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 03:56 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 385
Reputation: 10
|
Both are great but I'd take Fritz.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.
|