|
|
| Off Topic Almost Anything Goes |
03-22-2008, 12:59 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 31,593
Reputation: 494719
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by princefielder28
Marcus Landry will be defending Bealsey and he can match him athletically.
|
Don't lie.
I tried posting a humorous picture but a certain word didn't fly.
Beasley is a mantank who destroys anything in his path.
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
03-22-2008, 01:01 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Professor (Hall of Famer)
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 34,282
Reputation: 1535464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperKevin
That's funny, I didn't realize Fullerton had a player like Michael Beasley.
|
Ok so when you say "they", you mean Beasley. And your argument is that one person is going to beat a team, which I fundamentally disagree with. Unless that one person is Lebron James anyway.
__________________
Nobody cares about your stupid fantasy team.
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 01:19 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Icon
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,144
Reputation: 220179
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNIPER26
Don't lie.
I tried posting a humorous picture but a certain word didn't fly.
Beasley is a mantank who destroys anything in his path.
|
Yeah, no way does Landry match Beasly, but Wisconsin is a much much better team than Kansas State. I'll take 2 on 5 any day.
__________________
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 01:32 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,106
Reputation: 1860
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosanac01
im 27/32 anyone better than this?
|
30/32 .. the only two I didn't pick were the 13 over 4 games.
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 01:33 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,845
Reputation: 17254
|
duke gettin all the calls
i hate paulus
its 8 on 5
__________________

cred 2 BoneKrusher
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 01:44 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,845
Reputation: 17254
|
10:20 left in the 1st half; duke already in the 1 and 1s
10 ft to 1
__________________

cred 2 BoneKrusher
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 02:11 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 25,127
Reputation: 1073638
|
West Virginia is just too one-dimensional to move far in the tourney and I don't think they'll be able to pull off a win in the second half. Looking ahead for Duke after that it'll be the winner of Purdue/Xavier. Duke can surely beat Purdue, but I think their road will end when they lose to Xavier.
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 02:40 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,399
Reputation: 1757247
|
Duke is rattled right now, everyone is trying to do it himself.
WVU up 5.
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 03:10 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,106
Reputation: 1860
|
If you want me to put it honestly -- dook has too many white guys. I am a white guy saying that to beat it all. But realistically, besides Nelson (who has played awful) and Henderson, dook has no one who can create their own shot. Scheyer, Paulus and Singler all rely too heavily on the outside perimeter jumper. As has always been the case, if you rely solely on that jumper, you will have those days when nothing goes right.
Also, when are they ever going to get a legit post presence for when they have these days when their jumpers are not falling?
Thankfully for them, they play hard defense that always keeps them in games.
In any case, I hope West Virginia doesn't let me down.
60-49 WVA with 4:23 remaining
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 03:11 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,956
Reputation: 85172
|
The refs are going to give Duke ever opportunity to win. They have shot twice as many free throws as WVU.
__________________
Thanks to Bone Krusher for the sig
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 03:14 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Brother Mouzone
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: It's clobberin' time.
Posts: 39,874
Reputation: 4085252
|
I can't bring myself to enjoy Duke being beaten by WVU, simply because Bob Huggins is a giant scumbag.
__________________
RIP TheManInBlack
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 03:16 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Newberry, FL.
Posts: 4,923
Reputation: 880
|
that...and I had Duke in my sweet sixteen...or maybe even my elite eight...damn...
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 03:32 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,399
Reputation: 1757247
|
Well, a lot of people said that Duke's lack of rebounding and their reliance on the three point shot will kill them...and it did.
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 03:33 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,845
Reputation: 17254
|
SWEET 16!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i had wvu beatin duke in my bracket
__________________

cred 2 BoneKrusher
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 03:38 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,399
Reputation: 1757247
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwilk103
SWEET 16!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i had wvu beatin duke in my bracket
|
Me too that just skyrocketed me in the standings.
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 04:02 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,901
Reputation: 3485
|
I had Duke in my Elite 8. Oh well. I don't care. THEY LOST!! SUCK IT DUKE BOYS!
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 04:14 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 909
Reputation: 16178
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devinhester=R.O.Y 2006
The refs are going to give Duke ever opportunity to win. They have shot twice as many free throws as WVU.
|
I HATE when people say things like this. The refs are paid professionals. Their jobs are dependent on their accuracy. Could it possibly be that WVU just fouled Duke more often than Duke fouled WVU? Refs have ZERO vested interest in who wins these games. There is NO conspiracy here. Stop trying to make it seem like there is.
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 04:19 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,901
Reputation: 3485
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyjo672
I HATE when people say things like this. The refs are paid professionals. Their jobs are dependent on their accuracy. Could it possibly be that WVU just fouled Duke more often than Duke fouled WVU? Refs have ZERO vested interest in who wins these games. There is NO conspiracy here. Stop trying to make it seem like there is.
|
You're either a Duke fan or obviously you've never watched a Duke game.
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 04:20 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,845
Reputation: 17254
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyjo672
I HATE when people say things like this. The refs are paid professionals. Their jobs are dependent on their accuracy. Could it possibly be that WVU just fouled Duke more often than Duke fouled WVU? Refs have ZERO vested interest in who wins these games. There is NO conspiracy here. Stop trying to make it seem like there is.
|
did you watch the game? the calls so favored duke
__________________

cred 2 BoneKrusher
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 04:22 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 909
Reputation: 16178
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwilk103
did you watch the game? the calls so favored duke
|
EVERY second of it. WVU fouled Duke more. Plain and simple.
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 04:23 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 909
Reputation: 16178
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJohn98
You're either a Duke fan or obviously you've never watched a Duke game.
|
I'm no Duke fan. In fact, I couldn't be more indifferent about the game. But yes, I did watch the game.
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 04:25 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Soldier Field
Posts: 19,378
Reputation: 71208
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperKevin
Kansas State should beat Wisconsin today. They are just too athletic not to beat Wisconsin.
|
Wisconsin is the most sound team in the tournament right now on both ends of the floor. K-State may be athletic but they don't play the defense, they don't pass as well, they don't shoot as well, and they don't execute as well as Wisconsin.
Being athletic doesn't mean a whole helluva lot if you're playing a team that can execute like Wisconsin can.
__________________
Another sig courtesy of BoneKrusher
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBCX
Despite looking better against an underachieving Eagles team, I still think the Bears are one of the worst teams in the NFL. I smell a blowout victory by the Lions this week and a division sweep.
|
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 04:30 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 909
Reputation: 16178
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetness34
Wisconsin is the most sound team in the tournament right now on both ends of the floor. K-State may be athletic but they don't play the defense, they don't pass as well, they don't shoot as well, and they don't execute as well as Wisconsin.
Being athletic doesn't mean a whole helluva lot if you're playing a team that can execute like Wisconsin can.
|
Not to mention I don't think anyone would say WVU is more athletic than Arizona. Or San Diego more athletic than UCONN. Athleticism doesn't add up to a whole lot in college basketball. I put a lot more emphasis on team play, and consistency.
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 04:46 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,100
Reputation: 451959
|
Dammit DUKE YOU JUST ****** ME OVER!
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 05:12 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Ghettosermon
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pentagon City, VA
Posts: 22,385
Reputation: 455091
|
Kstate is awful to watch, it's a wonder how they even got this far. It is basically watch Beasley or Walker go 1 on 5, and when they don't get the ball they won't play defense.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM.
|