Mark Wahlberg is the lead in everything, and he doesn't have Fillion's skills.
Wahlberg in Boogie Nights is just ******* awesome. I thought he was also great in The Basketball Diaries and I Heart Huckabees. That said Fillion is the ******* man. He NEEDS to be Nathan Drake, it is just perfect casting.
Plus in the credits it only has 2.
And I saw an interview where he said it wasn't a real BL movie.
Maybe they are hyping it that way now because Jay Chandrasekhar directed it.
I did not enjoy the Hunger Games whatsoever. As someone who had zero knowledge of the franchise going in, I thought it was really disappointing. Heavy handed in it's social critique, and I actually found the movie alot creepier then I thought I might.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Goosemahn
The APS is strong in this one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by killxswitch
Tears for Fears is better than whatever it is you happen to be thinking about right now.
I thought the movie, Hunger Games, was a let down but I thought the trilogy was a great read.
The movie felt shallow and had a lot of gaps in the story and I felt that the only reason I liked as much as I did was because I read the books.
I could see someone who didn't read the book not enjoying the movie.
Location: If we're gonna die, let's die looking like a Peruvian folk band.
Posts: 26,761
Reputation: 3028551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nalej
I thought the movie, Hunger Games, was a let down but I thought the trilogy was a great read.
The movie felt shallow and had a lot of gaps in the story and I felt that the only reason I liked as much as I did was because I read the books.
I could see someone who didn't read the book not enjoying the movie.
It was decent just felt that they could of included at least a little background on all the people and the world just seemed like lots of people no one cared about going and dying for no reason
It was decent just felt that they could of included at least a little background on all the people and the world just seemed like lots of people no one cared about going and dying for no reason
Yes, I can see that. That's part of the plot holes I mentioned. I know the whole back story so I understood why some the things were happening. The books all take place from the mind of Kat though so you get a whole lot more story and emotion from her. I felt she was dry in the movie. That's why the movie felt like a supplement to the book, not a stand alone product. The movie was 2.5 hours long though and it still felt incomplete. Making it the way I'd like would probably make it close to 4 hours long so that's why I forgive the movie for what it was.
I just watched Sucker Punch for the first time, and all I can say is what the **** was that? I am so confused as to what I just watched. That said, I don't think I've ever appreciated stockings as much as I do now. Emily Browning and Jamie Chung are so damn hot in that movie.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Goosemahn
The APS is strong in this one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by killxswitch
Tears for Fears is better than whatever it is you happen to be thinking about right now.
I just watched Sucker Punch for the first time, and all I can say is what the **** was that? I am so confused as to what I just watched. That said, I don't think I've ever appreciated stockings as much as I do now. Emily Browning and Jamie Chung are so damn hot in that movie.
The 'story' was the bare minimum required to excuse like five seemingly different scenarios Snyder just wanted to film.
It was like the Hangover for me. Everyone told me it was the funniest movie ever. And it was a huge let down. Funny, but not all time funny.
The hype people put on it hampered it.