What's wrong with Philip Rivers? - Page 3

cheesehead10790 · 12-31-2006, 12:25 AM

Ya it does. He lost the first 3 games because he wasnt on the same page as the rest of the team. It has everything to do with it imo.

njx9 · 12-31-2006, 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Ya it does. He lost the first 3 games because he wasnt on the same page as the rest of the team. It has everything to do with it imo.

you clearly haven't watched more than 30 seconds of denver broncos games this year. is it fun to be completely wrong?

cheesehead10790 · 12-31-2006, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by njx9

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Ya it does. He lost the first 3 games because he wasnt on the same page as the rest of the team. It has everything to do with it imo.

you clearly haven't watched more than 30 seconds of denver broncos games this year. is it fun to be completely wrong?

So when are you going to prove your point here?

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) · 12-31-2006, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Ya it does. He lost the first 3 games because he wasnt on the same page as the rest of the team. It has everything to do with it imo.

Actually, he threw for 2 TDs in each of those games, and really only looked bad against Seattle, which is understandable, being his first game and all. Plus the defense couldnt stop anyone those games, nor could the o-line block anyone. Their left tackle is Eric Pears.

njx9 · 12-31-2006, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Quote:

Originally Posted by njx9

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Ya it does. He lost the first 3 games because he wasnt on the same page as the rest of the team. It has everything to do with it imo.

you clearly haven't watched more than 30 seconds of denver broncos games this year. is it fun to be completely wrong?

So when are you going to prove your point here?

it's been proven in the broncos thread multiple times. why would i let you sidetrack this thread with an utterly baseless argument any more than you already have?if you really revel in being proven wrong, feel free to take it up with me in the broncos team thread.

cheesehead10790 · 12-31-2006, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisCybulski

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Ya it does. He lost the first 3 games because he wasnt on the same page as the rest of the team. It has everything to do with it imo.

Actually, he threw for 2 TDs in each of those games, and really only looked bad against Seattle, which is understandable, being his first game and all. Plus the defense couldnt stop anyone those games, nor could the o-line block anyone. Their left tackle is Eric Pears.

Ya i guess. But still I dont see that putting in Volek would help. Rivers is the best option at this point. Volek hasnt taken a snap all year.

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) · 12-31-2006, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Quote:

Originally Posted by njx9

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Ya it does. He lost the first 3 games because he wasnt on the same page as the rest of the team. It has everything to do with it imo.

you clearly haven't watched more than 30 seconds of denver broncos games this year. is it fun to be completely wrong?

So when are you going to prove your point here?

Cutler in those games was the best thing the Broncos had. Outside that terrible interception against Seattle, he's been excellent. Watch the Chiefs game, where they couldn't tackle LJ. The Chargers game, where LT ran free for 3 TDs, and the running game couldnt really get going on a consistent basis other than the one big gain. And Merriman straight making Pears his *****,

12-31-2006, 12:30 AM

You really don't see the parallel yet cheesehead?

cheesehead10790 · 12-31-2006, 12:35 AM

Umm ok about 3 posts up i just threw up the white flag but i guess you guys didnt see that.

Ok if you want me to say it CUTLER IS NOT THE REASON DENVER LOST 3 CONSECUTIVE GAMES.

Regardless Rivers is the right choice here.

4pAc · 12-31-2006, 12:35 AM

Reading the last two pages gave me a stomach ache(from laughing too hard)

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) · 12-31-2006, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Umm ok about 3 posts up i just threw up the white flag but i guess you guys didnt see that.

Ok if you want me to say it CUTLER IS NOT THE REASON DENVER LOST 3 CONSECUTIVE GAMES.

Regardless Rivers is the right choice here.

Sorry about that, I guess I just posted at the same time as you

draftguru151 · 12-31-2006, 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisCybulski

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Ya it does. He lost the first 3 games because he wasnt on the same page as the rest of the team. It has everything to do with it imo.

Actually, he threw for 2 TDs in each of those games, and really only looked bad against Seattle, which is understandable, being his first game and all. Plus the defense couldnt stop anyone those games, nor could the o-line block anyone. Their left tackle is Eric Pears.

Ya i guess. But still I dont see that putting in Volek would help. Rivers is the best option at this point. Volek hasnt taken a snap all year.

But he had those amazing games he is 1337!!!!11!1!!

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) · 12-31-2006, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by draftguru151

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisCybulski

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehead10790

Ya it does. He lost the first 3 games because he wasnt on the same page as the rest of the team. It has everything to do with it imo.

Actually, he threw for 2 TDs in each of those games, and really only looked bad against Seattle, which is understandable, being his first game and all. Plus the defense couldnt stop anyone those games, nor could the o-line block anyone. Their left tackle is Eric Pears.

Ya i guess. But still I dont see that putting in Volek would help. Rivers is the best option at this point. Volek hasnt taken a snap all year.

But he had those amazing games he is 1337!!!!11!1!!

QFT. Even better would be if they still had Cleo Lemon. Letting him go was the biggest mistake since drafting Leaf, who is also better than Rivers.

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) · 01-02-2007, 11:17 AM

WOW, another interception. How is this guy starting?

jkpigskin · 01-02-2007, 12:16 PM

he is still a good qb, but his lack of experience is showing as he is fading down the stretch... maybe its fatigue because in college they play around 13 games and rivers was doing great until the past couple weeks

P-L · 01-02-2007, 12:28 PM

What's the point of this thread? Rivers has had two bad games. And let me remind you that in one of those bad games, he threw 2 TD and 0 INT.

Vikings Fan · 01-02-2007, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patriots-Lions

What's the point of this thread? Rivers has had two bad games. And let me remind you that in one of those bad games, he threw 2 TD and 0 INT.

:roll: There is no point, people cant get over the fact that this is Mike Vicks 6th year in the league and he is still inconsistant. People say his recievers drop balls but I saw at LEAST 2 dropped INTs in the Eagles game. People need to get over the fact that Vick is and always will be inconsistant.

His supporting cast may not be the greatest but he doesnt step into the pocket even when he is given time.

01-02-2007, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patriots-Lions

What's the point of this thread? Rivers has had two bad games. And let me remind you that in one of those bad games, he threw 2 TD and 0 INT.

To show that Billy Volek should be the starter in San Diego.

sdpads24 · 01-02-2007, 07:15 PM

chargers have won 10 straight....who cares

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) · 01-02-2007, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdpads24

chargers have won 10 straight....who cares

While playing 1(one) AFC playoff team. Their record against teams currently in the AFC playoffs? 1-2. They're playing playoff teams only now, and Rivers playing like crap will NOT get it done.

rocco31fb · 01-02-2007, 07:24 PM

San Deigo had home field wrapped up with 2 games to go. With no need to win, the whole team relaxed and it showed in more than just Rivers. I'm sorry, but I think this thread was created because Chris is still mad the Broncos missed the playoffs.

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) · 01-02-2007, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rocco31fb

San Deigo had home field wrapped up with 2 games to go. With no need to win, the whole team relaxed and it showed in more than just Rivers. I'm sorry, but I think this thread was created because Chris is still mad the Broncos missed the playoffs.

I actually started this thread when it looked like we were in.. might have actually even been before th Bengals game ended, not sure. I'm not even really that pissed about missing the playoffs, it's disappointing, but the Broncos have nobody to blame but themselves. They should be a 12-4 team right now because they shoulda beaten STL, SF and SD the first time. But they aren't.

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) · 01-02-2007, 07:34 PM

And they actually didn't have homefield wrapped up, if they lost, Baltimore would get it.

rocco31fb · 01-02-2007, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisCybulski

Quote:

Originally Posted by rocco31fb

San Deigo had home field wrapped up with 2 games to go. With no need to win, the whole team relaxed and it showed in more than just Rivers. I'm sorry, but I think this thread was created because Chris is still mad the Broncos missed the playoffs.

I actually started this thread when it looked like we were in.. might have actually even been before th Bengals game ended, not sure. I'm not even really that pissed about missing the playoffs, it's disappointing, but the Broncos have nobody to blame but themselves. They should be a 12-4 team right now because they shoulda beaten STL, SF and SD the first time. But they aren't.

The Broncos should be a 10-6 team if they stayed with Plummer. They gave up on the season when they chose to start Cutler. You can't say they shoulda beat a team when they had a chance and didn't.

MichaelJordanEberle (sabf) · 01-02-2007, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rocco31fb

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisCybulski

Quote:

Originally Posted by rocco31fb

San Deigo had home field wrapped up with 2 games to go. With no need to win, the whole team relaxed and it showed in more than just Rivers. I'm sorry, but I think this thread was created because Chris is still mad the Broncos missed the playoffs.

I actually started this thread when it looked like we were in.. might have actually even been before th Bengals game ended, not sure. I'm not even really that pissed about missing the playoffs, it's disappointing, but the Broncos have nobody to blame but themselves. They should be a 12-4 team right now because they shoulda beaten STL, SF and SD the first time. But they aren't.

The Broncos should be a 10-6 team if they stayed with Plummer. They gave up on the season when they chose to start Cutler. You can't say they shoulda beat a team when they had a chance and didn't.

Well I'm not saying we got robbed of those games, I'm saying we pissed them away by playing badly. We were in position to win those games. And Plummer was awful, honestly, he was just terrible, Cutler was EASILY ten times better. Consider Cutler almost had a 2:1 TD:INT ratio and had 2 TDs in each of his first four starts(tying a rookie record) Plummer through 2 more INTs than TDs and only averaged 1 TD per game. The offense was stagnant when Plummer was in there, Cutler brought life to the offense.