|
|
| Pro Football Discuss professional football. |
05-14-2008, 11:36 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 19,966
Reputation: 1509449
|
I remember reading about the ESPN stuff other day, didn't know if it was threadworthy...But if he wants Spygate he as to blame his coach, he brought that on the team and gave people a reason to undermine their success.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Wright
I guarantee that if someone picks Cam Newton in the Top 5 they will regret it.
|
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 11:37 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 25,359
Reputation: 1165705
|
I am a big fan of the MTV comparison
ESPN started off specifically as a sports place with highlights and sports information, much like MTV started with music videos, but now it has turned into a big advertising, drama building, truely grabage channel outside of actual games and Baseball Tonight
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 11:42 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 8,134
Reputation: 249305
|
Well I know I call ESPN, BSPN because it's turned into a soap opera channel for guys and sports. I thought Brady's comparison to MTV was spot on. ESPN definitely, in my opinion, dropped in quality.
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 11:48 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Juggernaut
Legend
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 22,086
Reputation: 390419
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by princefielder28
I am a big fan of the MTV comparison
ESPN started off specifically as a sports place with highlights and sports information, much like MTV started with music videos, but now it has turned into a big advertising, drama building, truely grabage channel outside of actual games and Baseball Tonight
|
You can watch ESPN News if you want just highlights. I'm not the biggest fan of ESPN but they have just grown their product. There is still a place for just highlights and it is ESPN News.
__________________
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 11:49 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: THE ROCK
Posts: 2,465
Reputation: 6495
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockey+Manning=Shocking
Well I know I call ESPN, BSPN because it's turned into a soap opera channel for guys and sports. I thought Brady's comparison to MTV was spot on. ESPN definitely, in my opinion, dropped in quality.
|
I have to agree espn has dropped in quality.
__________________
Sick Sig by BoneKrusher
WHO DAT
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 11:50 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,141
Reputation: 223529
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jughead10
You can watch ESPN News if you want just highlights. I'm not the biggest fan of ESPN but they have just grown their product. There is still a place for just highlights and it is ESPN News.
|
Which is why ESPN News is set as my favorite channel on my TV.
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 11:52 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 4,542
Reputation: 5447
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crickett
Which is why ESPN News is set as my favorite channel on my TV.
|
Especially now that it is in HD.
__________________
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 11:53 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Juggernaut
Legend
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 22,086
Reputation: 390419
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crickett
Which is why ESPN News is set as my favorite channel on my TV.
|
It works out then. Because if that is what you want, you get in loop all day.
__________________
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 11:56 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 8,134
Reputation: 249305
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintsFanForLife
I have to agree espn has dropped in quality.
|
I wonder though, when exactly did it drop in quality though? Was it the summer where TO was fighting with the Eagles organization? I guess I am relating it in football terms because I don't really watch any other sport that intently, but seems to me, and I could be wrong, that ESPN turned from a sports channel, to a drama channel during that TO drama. Somehow it became more than just reporting the news. It was like they loved the drama and showing it over, and over, and over again.
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 12:01 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Juggernaut
Legend
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 22,086
Reputation: 390419
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockey+Manning=Shocking
I wonder though, when exactly did it drop in quality though? Was it the summer where TO was fighting with the Eagles organization? I guess I am relating it in football terms because I don't really watch any other sport that intently, but seems to me, and I could be wrong, that ESPN turned from a sports channel, to a drama channel during that TO drama. Somehow it became more than just reporting the news. It was like they loved the drama and showing it over, and over, and over again.
|
I don't think you can put your finger on one thing. Barry Bonds was probably a bigger story than TO. They assigned that one guy (whose name is slipping my right now) specifically to just Bonds. Also the success of shows like PTI, the success of the World Series of Poker, Playmakers, etc. These shows are being watched and making money so someone is liking it.
__________________
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 12:01 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: THE ROCK
Posts: 2,465
Reputation: 6495
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockey+Manning=Shocking
I wonder though, when exactly did it drop in quality though? Was it the summer where TO was fighting with the Eagles organization? I guess I am relating it in football terms because I don't really watch any other sport that intently, but seems to me, and I could be wrong, that ESPN turned from a sports channel, to a drama channel during that TO drama. Somehow it became more than just reporting the news. It was like they loved the drama and showing it over, and over, and over again.
|
Im the same way all I really watch is football. I think you are right. It was the T.O thing that sparked it all. They were on that story like flies on ****. They aired him doing situps in his yard all kinds of crap. From that point on its really gone down hill. They just want to show the bad part of the NFL. Its getting old IMO
__________________
Sick Sig by BoneKrusher
WHO DAT
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 12:12 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 8,134
Reputation: 249305
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jughead10
I don't think you can put your finger on one thing. Barry Bonds was probably a bigger story than TO. They assigned that one guy (whose name is slipping my right now) specifically to just Bonds. Also the success of shows like PTI, the success of the World Series of Poker, Playmakers, etc. These shows are being watched and making money so someone is liking it.
|
Yeah now that I think about it Bonds was another big thing. Bonds and TO actually changed my mind about ESPN. Yeah those are big time sports guys, but there is a BIG difference in reporting it and being on that story 24/7. That's drama mongering, if there is such a term. Instead of citing it as part of sports news, they almost had a special panel of it just for them. It was almost their way of getting ratings.
"Stay tune for our discussion on TO or bonds after this commerical break"
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 12:13 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Buffalo from Rochester
Posts: 1,075
Reputation: 1129
|
I remember when MTV was about the music *stares off nostalgically* . . . Wait, no I don't. 100 bucks says that in 5 years kids don't remember when espn was about the sport.
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 12:17 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Juggernaut
Legend
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 22,086
Reputation: 390419
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockey+Manning=Shocking
Yeah now that I think about it Bonds was another big thing. Bonds and TO actually changed my mind about ESPN. Yeah those are big time sports guys, but there is a BIG difference in reporting it and being on that story 24/7. That's drama mongering, if there is such a term. Instead of citing it as part of sports news, they almost had a special panel of it just for them. It was almost their way of getting ratings.
"Stay tune for our discussion on TO or bonds after this commerical break"
|
They were big stories dealing with controversial superstars in the two biggest sports in America. They were going to give it air time. As for ESPN now they don't give highlights as much as some want but they give what most people want. How many threads are this board deals with rankings or power rankings. Or how much coverage did ESPN give you on mock drafts with McShay and Kiper arguing with each other. That seems to be a fair reflection of what most on this board like to talk about.
I never thought I would defend ESPN.
__________________
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 12:23 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 8,134
Reputation: 249305
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jughead10
They were big stories dealing with controversial superstars in the two biggest sports in America. They were going to give it air time. As for ESPN now they don't give highlights as much as some want but they give what most people want. How many threads are this board deals with rankings or power rankings. Or how much coverage did ESPN give you on mock drafts with McShay and Kiper arguing with each other. That seems to be a fair reflection of what most on this board like to talk about.
I never thought I would defend ESPN.
|
Yeah the biggest stories is a thing that should be followed and reported, but they seemed to take this to the extreme. It was like how the regular media follows celebrity stuff. One big one is Brittany Spears. This was a sports version of drama. This went on beyond reporting in my opinion. I felt like it just dragged on and on.
And if you want the good stuff, you have to be a member of ESPN insider, so that means the regular, on the surface stuff, is basically on the main site, but god forbid you wanted more, you had to pay to be a member. It's just my opinion, but ESPN changed at some point around this time with it's reporting, and HOW, and what length they took to report it.
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 12:28 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,141
Reputation: 223529
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatEscape
I remember when MTV was about the music *stares off nostalgically* . . . Wait, no I don't. 100 bucks says that in 5 years kids don't remember when espn was about the sport.
|
The sad thing is.... I remember when MTV2 was about the music.
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 12:33 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Buffalo from Rochester
Posts: 1,075
Reputation: 1129
|
The growth of the insider changed espn for me, don't watch much tv, although I do follow every new house and southpark episode online, so for me the change happened when espn realized that people would pay to go to an actually sports website and so left the main pages to attract a larger audience, meaning none sports fans, so they brought in drama to get non sports fans on their main page. They've done the same thing on tv with their billion channels so their main channel has become more drama based to get more general audience as we sports fans will pay for our actual sports channels.
Last edited by TheGreatEscape : 05-14-2008 at 12:40 PM.
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 12:33 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Suck it Metsox
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: God blessed Texas
Posts: 20,167
Reputation: 3240965
|
The only thing i catch on ESPN now a days is PTI, Around the Horn, Jim Rome (only his "what i'm burning on" and "final burn" segments) and the games. Everything is else is complete garbage. NFL Live is a joke. Trey Wingo is an idiot. I love Mike & Mike but Golic is bringing that show down. I hate his ass.
I hate the fact that Dish jewed me out of the NFL Network.
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 12:35 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
DC Creeper
Icon
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16,633
Reputation: 1045143
|
Brady, to me, is just the the baggage handler at the airport. What he says means nothing to me. I don't care what he has done or how much money he has.
__________________
my scent?...like making love to a lumberjack
<TACKLE> i will ngata give you a bj raji
<+BOE> Scott, with Burfict's character concerns (whether legit or not) you think Pioli would draft him. :D
<+ScottWright> Why not. Baldwin does need a sparring partner...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermstheman83
What's with the hate on Ricky Stanzi? Those youtube clips of him with the hulk hogan theme music instantly make him better than Luck.
|
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 12:36 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Buffalo from Rochester
Posts: 1,075
Reputation: 1129
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crickett
The sad thing is.... I remember when MTV2 was about the music.
|
Ah but do you remember when MTV, not MTV2, was about the music? Cause I'll bet most people on here don't.
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 01:03 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 603
Reputation: 28
|
Every time an athlete speaks out against ESPN's or the media's coverage they always report on it, but have a guest like on Around the Horn or 1st and 10 say how rediculous a statement such and such was. The problem ESPN has is that they believe, similar to other news outlets, that their viewer is re tarded, so they dumb down the information to flying graphics and :30 second discussions on topics that need 10 minutes. With that they self promote blow hards whose goal is to create controversy rather than be a reporter or give insight.
Blowhards like:
Skip Bayless
Woody Paige
Jay Mariotti
Merill Hoge
Todd McShay (not enough time on air to be a true blow hard but his shock over information value is high)
Greg Easterbrook
Mike Fish
Doug Gotlieb
Mike Greenberg
They won't even let some of their better reporters criticize false or misleading statement made by some of these blowhards. Except to build controversy like McShay vs Kiper, and Sean Salisbury vs 'professor'.
__________________
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 02:46 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jersey
Posts: 2,417
Reputation: 1574
|
As much as I hate Brady and everything, I have to agree about ESPN, and the way it covers things lately. Although, it does work both ways...you have to wonder if Tom Brady gets the same legendary status he has now, without ESPN blowing up his story over and over again...
|
|
|
05-14-2008, 02:55 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 19,966
Reputation: 1509449
|
Skip Bayless makes me hate ESPN enough, God I can't find myself to listen to that man more then a few minutes, he has is favorites, and he has guys he hates, so no matter what he topic or subject is he has th same POV...He seems to have a fetish for saying something negative about Lebron every chance he gets, first it was "he never makes any big shots", then if he makes a great pass to set up the winning shot its "he was scared to shoot the ball", then the other day he was complaining about Lebron celebrating after his dunk, like its not a playoff game and adrenaline flowing or anything  It's like come on Skip, we all know you hate cetain guys, but your a sports analyst, aren't you supposed to cover topics and be un-biased? He makes me sick.
The rest of the guys are so watered down, its no real coverage anymore, I can't wait for Michael Vick to get out of jail so they can make a million headlines that start out "Are the Cowboys interested in Mike Vick"? I can already see it coming, when I have NFLNetword I rarely ever watch ESPN, espnews does the trick.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Wright
I guarantee that if someone picks Cam Newton in the Top 5 they will regret it.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.
|