2008 NFL Standings Prediction - Page 2

eaglesalltheway · 07-10-2008, 11:32 AM

I'll kill a few birds with one stone...
Eagles 10-6
Cowboys- 10-6
Giants 9-7
Redskins 6-10
Can't say who wins the division, and ginoring homersim, it could go either way, IMO.

eaglesalltheway · 07-10-2008, 11:37 AM

Hers a few more...
Packers 10-6
Vikings 9-7
Bears 7-9
Lions 6-10

Turtlepower · 07-10-2008, 11:43 AM

FYI, I'm only putting down predictions that everyone makes for his or her own team.

eaglesalltheway · 07-10-2008, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turtlepower

FYI, I'm only putting down predictions that everyone makes for his or her own team.

oops, my bad.

wicket · 07-10-2008, 12:08 PM

Saints 10-6 (seems like the whole division does it)

terribletowel39 · 07-10-2008, 12:18 PM

Looking at the schedule we can hang with everyone we play. We have a really brutal stretch of some good ass offenses starting week 10. We have Colts, Chargers, Bengals, Patriots, then Cowboys. It will be a real test that 5 week stretch and am hoping to come out of it atleast 3-2. If that happens I say we are 12-4, Its possible we come out of it 1-4 so then it would be 10-6, so put me down for being in the middle at 11-5.

CJSchneider · 07-10-2008, 12:26 PM

N.o. 13-3
S.f. 7-9

Turtlepower · 07-10-2008, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJSchneider

N.o. 13-3
S.f. 7-9

You gotta pick one. Which team is YOUR team?

Canadian_kid16 · 07-10-2008, 12:34 PM

Bucs: 10-6

Im_a_Romosexual · 07-10-2008, 12:43 PM

13-3 Cowboys

Staubach12 · 07-10-2008, 12:45 PM

Cowboys 14-2

FlyingElvis · 07-10-2008, 01:09 PM

13-3

bearsfan_51 · 07-10-2008, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Carter

They have no offense (one of the worst in the NFL).

Their defense is probably 3rd best in the division.

They are simply not that good. Just like the Lions.

And yet they still swept the Packers, once again. It's funny how much things change in a year, as last year almost everyone considered the Bears the vastly superior team in the division.

Saying the Packers have no holes is just arrogant hubris. It's the offseason, there will be suprises, and in a division with no strong teams (no..the Packers are not a strong team) nothing would suprise me.

cdub11 · 07-10-2008, 01:13 PM

Cowboys 13-3

07-10-2008, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bearsfan_51

And yet they still swept the Packers, once again. It's funny how much things change in a year, as last year almost everyone considered the Bears the vastly superior team in the division.

Saying the Packers have no holes is just arrogant hubris. It's the offseason, there will be suprises, and in a division with no strong teams (no..the Packers are not a strong team) nothing would suprise me.

Your homerism is laughable. The Packers aren't a strong team? Really? They were the 2nd or 3rd best team in the NFC last season, depending on how you look at it.

Other than Favre (who according to you is mediocre at best in the playoffs anyway), they really haven't lost anybody and they were the youngest team in the league last year. They'll improve even without the few additions they made in the draft and free agency.

But yes, they're a weak team.

Oh, and the Bears were considered favourites before a lot of the Packers young players stepped up, bought into McCarthy's system, etc. Plus, the Bears lost some pieces this year and are a year older which is likely a negative for them due to their age at a lot of positions.

Strongside · 07-10-2008, 01:23 PM

Steelers: 11-5

leroyisgod · 07-10-2008, 01:27 PM

afc east

NE- 12-4
Buf- 10-6
NYJ- 8-8
Mia- 4-12

afc north

Cle- 11-5
Pit- 11-5
Cin- 8-8
Bal- 5-11

afc south

Ind- 11-5
Jax- 10-6
Hou- 9-7
Ten- 6-10

afc west

SD- 12-4
KC- 6-10
Oak- 6-10
Den- 5-11

nfc east

Dal- 12-4
NYG- 11-5
Phi- 8-8
Was- 8-8

nfc north

GB- 9-7
Det- 8-8
Min- 7-9
Chi- 3-13

nfc south

NO- 10-6
Car- 10-6
TB- 7-9
Atl- 3-13

nfc west

Ari- 9-7
Sea- 9-7
Stl- 5-11
SF- 3-13

AFC wild cards- Pitt & Jac
NFC wild cards- NYG & CAr

Michigan · 07-10-2008, 01:31 PM

Detroit 8-8

Feelin good about this year.

yo123 · 07-10-2008, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michigan

Detroit 8-8

Feelin good about this year.

Why would you do that to yourself?

Vikings 10-6

IceKubes · 07-10-2008, 01:51 PM

Texans 9-7

bearsfan_51 · 07-10-2008, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draft Ginger

Your homerism is laughable. The Packers aren't a strong team? Really? They were the 2nd or 3rd best team in the NFC last season, depending on how you look at it.

Other than Favre (who according to you is mediocre at best in the playoffs anyway), they really haven't lost anybody and they were the youngest team in the league last year. They'll improve even without the few additions they made in the draft and free agency.

But yes, they're a weak team.

Oh, and the Bears were considered favourites before a lot of the Packers young players stepped up, bought into McCarthy's system, etc. Plus, the Bears lost some pieces this year and are a year older which is likely a negative for them due to their age at a lot of positions.

I'm really not a homer at all, I think the Bears will win 6-8 games next year, I just think Packers fans are the biggest and most blind homers in the world.

Essentially your argument is that the Packers were good last year so they'll be good this year. I really can't say anything to that which I haven't already said other than we'll see. Most of the players that you think are great I think were playing well over their heads. I don't think the Packers are a weak team, I never said that, but I don't think they are a guarantee to be a strong team in the slightest.

Also, Favre isn't a bad playoff quarterback according to me. He's a bad playoff quarterback period. I came with statistics. You came with nothing. Speaking of which, here's another fact you made up, the Bears are old. The Bears have two starters over the age of 30. The Packers have 5. So the Packers are getting better with age, but the Bears are getting worse? Respond if you like, I doubt I'll do in kind as I don't waste my time with people who make **** up.

Paranoidmoonduck · 07-10-2008, 02:09 PM

Raiders will go 7-9

NIN1984 · 07-10-2008, 02:32 PM

Agreed, 7-9 for the Raiders.

nfrillman · 07-10-2008, 02:32 PM

St. Louis 8-8

07-10-2008, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bearsfan_51

I'm really not a homer at all, I think the Bears will win 6-8 games next year, I just think Packers fans are the biggest and most blind homers in the world.

Essentially your argument is that the Packers were good last year so they'll be good this year. I really can't say anything to that which I haven't already said other than we'll see. Most of the players that you think are great I think were playing well over their heads. I don't think the Packers are a weak team, I never said that, but I don't think they are a guarantee to be a strong team in the slightest.

Also, Favre isn't a bad playoff quarterback according to me. He's a bad playoff quarterback period. I came with statistics. You came with nothing. Speaking of which, here's another fact you made up, the Bears are old. The Bears have two starters over the age of 30. The Packers have 5. So the Packers are getting better with age, but the Bears are getting worse? Respond if you like, I doubt I'll do in kind as I don't waste my time with people who make **** up.

The Bears were old when they made that Super Bowl run. They don't have as many key young players as the Packers do.

I think the Bears played over their head last year. They'll come back to Earth this season and be even more of a disgrace. That's basically your argument against the Packers.

As for Favre, I'm just saying that either you admit he's a great quarterback and was helping the team a lot and he's a big loss or he was not very good (like you said) and he won't be missed very much. Pretty simple, he can't be both terrible and a big loss.