|
|
| Pro Football Discuss professional football. |
03-10-2007, 11:54 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 6,730
Reputation: 56147
|
1996:
Keyshawn Johnson - Still produces at a very high level
Terry Glenn - Never more than a number two
Eddie Kennison - Solid, but never an elite receiver imo
Marvin Harrison - Top 3 or 4 of all time and in 04 a receiver most mentioned by DBs as the hardest to cover
Eric Moulds - See Kennison
Amani Toomer - Good number two, nothing more.
Mushin Muhhamed - Solid and at time spectacular, somewhat inconsistent at times
Bobby Engram - Never healthy
Terrel Owens - Amazingly good, when he shuts up and concentrates
Joe Horn - See above
2001:
Santana Moss - Still isn't utilised in the right way, could be an amazing talent, still finding himself
Reggie Wayne - Number two to one of the best of all time, probably beginning to become one of the league's best
Chad Johnson - Top 3 currently in the league
Chris Chambers - Inconsistent
Steve Smith - Top 3 currently in the league
T.J. Houshmandzadeh - Will end up as the primary target somewhere soon. Great number two receiver.
I think 2001, you've got Steve Smith who's only one of three guys ever to win the triple crown and has been to three probowls, Chad Johnson who's been amazing his entire career and continues to school defensive backs even when injured, Reggie Wayne who's helped manning get to the amazing heights he has.
2001 might not have more probowlers than 1996, but the calibre of the players who are probowlers is much higher than that of their 1996 counterparts.
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
03-11-2007, 01:36 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Lynn Swan of SWDC Hall of Fame
Posts: 18,133
Reputation: 172402
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlindSite
1996:
Keyshawn Johnson - Still produces at a very high level
Terry Glenn - Never more than a number two
Eddie Kennison - Solid, but never an elite receiver imo
Marvin Harrison - Top 3 or 4 of all time and in 04 a receiver most mentioned by DBs as the hardest to cover
Eric Moulds - See Kennison
Amani Toomer - Good number two, nothing more.
Mushin Muhhamed - Solid and at time spectacular, somewhat inconsistent at times
Bobby Engram - Never healthy
Terrel Owens - Amazingly good, when he shuts up and concentrates
Joe Horn - See above
2001:
Santana Moss - Still isn't utilised in the right way, could be an amazing talent, still finding himself
Reggie Wayne - Number two to one of the best of all time, probably beginning to become one of the league's best
Chad Johnson - Top 3 currently in the league
Chris Chambers - Inconsistent
Steve Smith - Top 3 currently in the league
T.J. Houshmandzadeh - Will end up as the primary target somewhere soon. Great number two receiver.
I think 2001, you've got Steve Smith who's only one of three guys ever to win the triple crown and has been to three probowls, Chad Johnson who's been amazing his entire career and continues to school defensive backs even when injured, Reggie Wayne who's helped manning get to the amazing heights he has.
2001 might not have more probowlers than 1996, but the calibre of the players who are probowlers is much higher than that of their 1996 counterparts.
|
That is absolutely a wrong way to look at it in my opinion. Especially when that list disregards all the busts the '01 class had, while including the mediocre receivers from the '96 class. Top to bottom, with every receiver in the class considered, the '96 class trumps the '01 class easily.
- David Terrell
- Koren Robinson
- Rod Gardner
- Freddie Mitchell
The '96 class had no 'busts' in the first round like '01 had. Top to bottom, it was deeper. '96 has two Hall of Fame caliber talents, whereas the '01 does not.
Last edited by Shiver : 03-11-2007 at 03:04 AM.
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 05:10 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 1,290
Reputation: 26519
|
i cant believe people like 01 better, 96 has 2 hall of famers, 1 of the top 3 wrs of all time and plenty of number 1 targets that have been doing great jobs for their teams for many years
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 05:25 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,764
Reputation: 9588
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7-11
i cant believe people like 01 better, 96 has 2 hall of famers, 1 of the top 3 wrs of all time and plenty of number 1 targets that have been doing great jobs for their teams for many years
|
Maybe Wait till the 96 Class finally retires and you gotta figure... the 01 class only had 5 years vs. the 10 years.
__________________
Yeah, I play WoW too.[/center]
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 05:59 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
Icon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: :3
Posts: 17,552
Reputation: 466188
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlindSite
1996:
Keyshawn Johnson - Still produces at a very high level
Terry Glenn - Never more than a number two
Eddie Kennison - Solid, but never an elite receiver imo
Marvin Harrison - Top 3 or 4 of all time and in 04 a receiver most mentioned by DBs as the hardest to cover
Eric Moulds - See Kennison
Amani Toomer - Good number two, nothing more.
Mushin Muhhamed - Solid and at time spectacular, somewhat inconsistent at times
Bobby Engram - Never healthy
Terrel Owens - Amazingly good, when he shuts up and concentrates
Joe Horn - See above
2001:
Santana Moss - Still isn't utilised in the right way, could be an amazing talent, still finding himself
Reggie Wayne - Number two to one of the best of all time, probably beginning to become one of the league's best
Chad Johnson - Top 3 currently in the league
Chris Chambers - Inconsistent
Steve Smith - Top 3 currently in the league
T.J. Houshmandzadeh - Will end up as the primary target somewhere soon. Great number two receiver.
I think 2001, you've got Steve Smith who's only one of three guys ever to win the triple crown and has been to three probowls, Chad Johnson who's been amazing his entire career and continues to school defensive backs even when injured, Reggie Wayne who's helped manning get to the amazing heights he has.
2001 might not have more probowlers than 1996, but the calibre of the players who are probowlers is much higher than that of their 1996 counterparts.
|
No, to you 01 is better because Steve Smith was in it.
That's all you needed to say, dude. We know how you really feel.
__________________

by BoneKrusher
Quote:
|
<TheUnseen> Drunken Canadian Bastard: There's an APS for that
|
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 07:02 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
I remembered during the 96 draft how Sterling Sharpe said that Harrison was the best WR available. I thought he was a bit over the top, but guess he was prophetic then. ;-)
It is interesting to see how the 96 class developed compared to the 2001 class. It would be cool to see how the teams have been drafting these last few years .....
|
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 02:02 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Emmaus, PA
Posts: 12,357
Reputation: 1194716
|
96 is by far and away the better one. This years class my one day compare to 01, maybe even better, who knows.
__________________
Nanna Bryndís Hilmarsdóttir is a goddess
Rest in Peace, themaninblack
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 02:04 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Eugene
Posts: 6,844
Reputation: 10364
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by eaglesalltheway
96 is by far and away the better one. This years class my one day compare to 01, maybe even better, who knows.
|
Yeah, this discussion shouldn't even take place for another 6 years.
__________________
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 02:11 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 278
Reputation: 19
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by etk
This 07 WR class should be pretty good. Unlikely it will touch the 96 class though.
|
yea this years WR class is great- Meachan, Johnson, Bowe, Jarret, Rice etc. IMO could be better than the 96 class.
__________________
Give Kyle Boller 1 Last Chance
#1 supporter of Demetrius Williams!
I used to be MaddenPlayer52
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 02:14 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Team Leader
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 12,070
Reputation: 185507
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaVeNFaNaCtIc
yea this years WR class is great- Meachan, Johnson, Bowe, Jarret, Rice etc. IMO could be better than the 96 class.
|
Yes, if history is any indication, atleast one of those guys might turn out to be a bust.
__________________

Sig by Primetime21
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 02:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NFC East Champs
Posts: 6,806
Reputation: 196932
|
04 had Fitzgerald, Roy Williams, Reggie Williams, Michael Clayton, Lee Evans, then a bust in Woods and an up in the air Michael Jenkins. And a few post up I think you meant to spell Meachem & Jarrett, no biggie.
Last edited by JRTPlaya21 : 03-11-2007 at 02:29 PM.
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 02:44 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Icon
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sioux Falls
Posts: 16,476
Reputation: 284561
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRTPlaya21
04 had Fitzgerald, Roy Williams, Reggie Williams, Michael Clayton, Lee Evans, then a bust in Woods and an up in the air Michael Jenkins. And a few post up I think you meant to spell Meachem & Jarrett, no biggie.
|
Yeah, I was about to mention the WR class of 04. There are 3 recievers in there who had fantastic seasons last year (Evans, Roy Williams, and Fitzgerald would have if he hadn't gotten injured). I don't know what to think about Reggie and Clayton yet. Reggie showed some signs last year.
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 02:57 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
|
96 looks a lot better IMO
|
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 03:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bethlehem, PA
Posts: 8,861
Reputation: 373070
|
I gotta say 96 although although 01 has a lot of talent too
__________________
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 05:08 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 6,730
Reputation: 56147
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Unseen
No, to you 01 is better because Steve Smith was in it.
That's all you needed to say, dude. We know how you really feel.
|
Actually I think its the best because its got both Johnson and Steve Smith, two players who'll be dominant for another 5 years in the league and probably supplant some of the guys from the 96 class who you're slobbering over.
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 05:10 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 3,894
Reputation: 2331
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bored of education
Ken-Yon Rambo HAHHAHHA
|
Hey you know the guys pretty good in the CFL.....haha im a canadian and i cant even say that with a straight face HAHAHA!!
__________________

Sig By Diehardvikingfan
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 05:22 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 802
Reputation: 361
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7-11
i cant believe people like 01 better, 96 has 2 hall of famers, 1 of the top 3 wrs of all time and plenty of number 1 targets that have been doing great jobs for their teams for many years
|
who are the two hofers? TO will never get enough votes
__________________
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 05:27 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
:/
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: RAWR
Posts: 37,141
Reputation: 2185245
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioState
who are the two hofers? TO will never get enough votes
|
He still has HOF numbers.
__________________

<Gaius_Baltar> That is correct comahan
<vidae> I ******* LOVE YOU DG
<njx9> <3 dg
|
|
|
03-12-2007, 08:13 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,138
Reputation: -170
|
96 is the better class, no contest. 1 sure fire Hall of Famer. One bubble Hall of Famer (TO).
Can't say that for anyone in the 2001 draft.
|
|
|
03-12-2007, 09:57 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bulimia twice the taste less calories
Posts: 3,467
Reputation: 49
|
I like the 01 guys a little more there the guys on the top of their game and have like 10 years left to play.
__________________
Thanks to jackalope
|
|
|
03-12-2007, 10:05 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,756
Reputation: 1373
|
'96 without question.
__________________

sig thanks to Go_Eagles77
|
|
|
03-12-2007, 11:35 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 1,586
Reputation: 248
|
I give it to 96, they have the slight edge in championships and they are the deeper class
__________________

fenikz
"Pride comes before the fall" - Mark Dantonio
35-21
|
|
|
03-12-2007, 12:23 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 908
Reputation: 5784
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Stiller
Maybe Wait till the 96 Class finally retires and you gotta figure... the 01 class only had 5 years vs. the 10 years.
|
The 96 class has already won this debate. There are 10 guys in that class still playing today. 10 Wr's in one draft class playing for 11 seasons. 9 of them still either the #1 or #2 receiver. Amazing.
|
|
|
03-12-2007, 04:56 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 385
Reputation: -142
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by princefielder28
01 has some pretty big names, but 96 is collectively solid
|
Agreed, and how'd you get up to 2,200 posts? A couple of months ago you had like 500?
|
|
|
03-12-2007, 05:03 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,143
Reputation: 46580
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxV
Yes, if history is any indication, atleast one of those guys might turn out to be a bust.
|
Will be Bowe IMO
__________________
sig by BoneKrusher
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM.
|