|
|
| College Football Discuss College Football |
04-27-2012, 07:38 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ft. Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 681
Reputation: 55884
|
Final Four in College Football...
What are people's thoughts?
I'm personally really excited for this. This way they can continue to keep the bowl games in existence, and still have a fair shake at who wins the NC. I think it's a move in the right direction. I wonder if they will have qualifying games, or if it'll just be the BCS #1-#4?
__________________
-The Contrarian Proletarian
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
04-27-2012, 12:23 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Mr. Rodgers' Neighborhood
Icon
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Resident Clippers fan
Posts: 15,226
Reputation: 959059
|
Should be BCS #1-4.
In 2011:
#1 LSU vs. #4 Stanford
#2 Alabama vs. #3 Oklahoma State
In 2010:
#1 Auburn vs. #4 Stanford
#2 Oregon vs. #3 TCU
Just for an idea how it would have played out in previous years. I would have loved to see those games play out.
|
|
|
04-27-2012, 02:06 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ft. Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 681
Reputation: 55884
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjsunstein
Just for an idea how it would have played out in previous years. I would have loved to see those games play out.
|
There aren't any football fans alive that wouldn't love to see this. And you also can think of the implications on the Draft that this format would have. Talk about having to show up and play clutch football. These two games in a row for a team would really help scouts gauge how players are under pressure.
__________________
-The Contrarian Proletarian
|
|
|
04-27-2012, 03:54 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: State of Golden Insincerity
Posts: 402
Reputation: 59934
|
Final 4 games would start in late January, after the bowl games unless they can link those 2 games to the big bowls, maybe on a rotating basis for the big $ involved.
The NC game remains in early February just before the SB.
|
|
|
05-04-2012, 07:58 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Professor (Hall of Famer)
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 34,291
Reputation: 1535464
|
The latest proposal has suggested that the top 4 will consist of conference champions that finish in the top 6 of the BCS (or whatever) standings. If 4 conference champions can't be found out of the top 6, they will pick at-large teams in order.
Here's what would have happened last year under that scenario:
1) LSU (13-0) vs. 4) Alabama (11-1)
2) OK State (11-1) vs. 3) Oregon (11-2)
And in 2010:
1) Auburn (13-0) vs. 4) Wisconsin (11-1)
2) Oregon (12-0) vs. 3) TCU (12-0)
I like it.
__________________
Nobody cares about your stupid fantasy team.
Last edited by bearsfan_51 : 05-04-2012 at 08:42 PM.
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 12:37 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Capstone
Posts: 1,040
Reputation: 51931
|
Alabama was #2 in the BCS poll prior to the bowl games last year. They would not have played LSU in this scenario.
The only thing that I've always disagreed with is going with conference champions. All conferences aren't equal, nor do all conferences play a championship game.
This is nothing more than an attempt put forth to limit the SEC under the guise of egalitarianism that it's impossible not to see through.
By the way, what conference does Notre Dame belong to again?
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 01:07 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Professor (Hall of Famer)
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 34,291
Reputation: 1535464
|
Yes, they would have. Re-read my post. Conference champs fill the slots first.
Also, if people really wanted to limit the SEC they could just have a fan spelling contest.
__________________
Nobody cares about your stupid fantasy team.
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 03:24 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Website Contributor
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 12,536
Reputation: 4624466
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearsfan_51
Yes, they would have. Re-read my post. Conference champs fill the slots first.
Also, if people really wanted to limit the SEC they could just have a fan spelling contest.
|
Oh yeah?!
F-A-N
IN YOUR FACE, BF!
__________________
Still Team The Ke$ha!!!
[@TDWinstead]
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelJordanEberle (sabf)
Damn Ke$ha is sexy.
|

|
|
|
05-05-2012, 09:42 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: State of Golden Insincerity
Posts: 402
Reputation: 59934
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearsfan_51
Yes, they would have. Re-read my post. Conference champs fill the slots first.
Also, if people really wanted to limit the SEC they could just have a fan spelling contest.
|
Um so besser:
N-A-T-I-O-N-A-L C-H-A-M-P-I-O-N-S...... more of them than anyone else. And more tasteful tats than Jim Tressel's probationary Buckeyes.
If we have the bracketology, it would be between the Big 10 & Pac12 to face the winner of the SECCG, or the Big 12 winner (TCU until Texas rediscovers its gonads). If they want to accommodate Notre Dame they can have a private school bracket but BC, TCU, & Stanford are already in conferences. Golden Domers are marooned on their own island, or more likely voted OFF the island
Last edited by jojo : 05-07-2012 at 09:46 AM.
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 09:51 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rotterdam, NL
Posts: 8,292
Reputation: 214905
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearsfan_51
The latest proposal has suggested that the top 4 will consist of conference champions that finish in the top 6 of the BCS (or whatever) standings. If 4 conference champions can't be found out of the top 6, they will pick at-large teams in order.
Here's what would have happened last year under that scenario:
1) LSU (13-0) vs. 4) Alabama (11-1)
2) OK State (11-1) vs. 3) Oregon (11-2)
And in 2010:
1) Auburn (13-0) vs. 4) Wisconsin (11-1)
2) Oregon (12-0) vs. 3) TCU (12-0)
I like it.
|
that could theoretically mean that the top 2 teams in the country are left out of the playoffs
__________________

Least favourite potential saints first roundpick as cited pre-draft
2010: Patrick Robinson --> Check
2011: Mark Ingram --> Check
2012: no pick
2013: Kenny Vaccaro --> Check
:shootme:
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 10:28 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Professor (Hall of Famer)
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 34,291
Reputation: 1535464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wicket
that could theoretically mean that the top 2 teams in the country are left out of the playoffs
|
Meh...win your conference.
__________________
Nobody cares about your stupid fantasy team.
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 10:35 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rotterdam, NL
Posts: 8,292
Reputation: 214905
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearsfan_51
Meh...win your conference.
|
just saying it could happen
__________________

Least favourite potential saints first roundpick as cited pre-draft
2010: Patrick Robinson --> Check
2011: Mark Ingram --> Check
2012: no pick
2013: Kenny Vaccaro --> Check
:shootme:
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 01:24 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Capstone
Posts: 1,040
Reputation: 51931
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearsfan_51
Yes, they would have. Re-read my post. Conference champs fill the slots first.
Also, if people really wanted to limit the SEC they could just have a fan spelling contest.
|
At least the Big-10 has a chance in a spelling contest...
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 01:26 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
TomTom Out
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: the 28th state
Posts: 25,765
Reputation: 4078996
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearsfan_51
Meh...win your conference.
|
Yup, that should be part of the deal.
__________________
Pick the Winners / '08: 171-96 (W) / '09: 177-90 / '10: 171-96 / '11: 183-84 (W) / '12: 173-94
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 01:34 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Capstone
Posts: 1,040
Reputation: 51931
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent
Yup, that should be part of the deal.
|
No it shouldn't.
If we've learned anything during the BCS era, it's that most of the teams outside the SEC that do win their conference don't deserve to be playing for a national title.
Are you people actually trying to assert that Clemson was more worthy of being in a playoff last year over Alabama?
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 02:20 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
The Professor (Hall of Famer)
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 34,291
Reputation: 1535464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHL6719
Are you people actually trying to assert that Clemson was more worthy of being in a playoff last year over Alabama?
|
No, and under the new rules, they wouldn't have been. Please learn to read. I even gave you a freaking example.
__________________
Nobody cares about your stupid fantasy team.
|
|
|
05-05-2012, 05:30 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: R4L 3:16 says I just whipped your ass
Posts: 11,944
Reputation: 2227871
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearsfan_51
No, and under the new rules, they wouldn't have been. Please learn to read. I even gave you a freaking example.
|
You should know by know reading comprehension isn't exactly this place's strong suit.
__________________
Props to BK for the sig
"Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict, half animal half man"
Quote:
Originally Posted by njx9
that's because we're the only animal capable of getting it from other animals. the day a goat can milk cows, it will.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.
|