David Molk: "I’m the Best Center in the Draft"

[K Train]

Originally Posted by D-Unit

You keep harping on Molk-Legursky comparison, but that's a far stretch out of left field. Similar heights, don't make similar players. Molk is way more battle tested against tougher competition. Legursky came from Marshall and was more of a project. ...and that's just a small factor... there are so many other ways they are different. Player comparisons in general never really work.

I can see the underlying factor here though... your favortism on Konz to be a Steeler.

i dont really favor him to the steelers, im not opposed but would prefer glenn, adams, osemele....but i do like him.

i know the competition is different, but AQ shipley was battle tested in the big 10, a remmington winner, a team captain...ect ect, i just thought physically (mostly being a freak in the weight room) he and legursky compare favorably in just about every way.

again theres always exceptions, im just not very high on molk

[D-Unit]

Originally Posted by K Train

i dont really favor him to the steelers, im not opposed but would prefer glenn, adams, osemele....but i do like him.

i know the competition is different, but AQ shipley was battle tested in the big 10, a remmington winner, a team captain...ect ect, i just thought physically (mostly being a freak in the weight room) he and legursky compare favorably in just about every way.

again theres always exceptions, im just not very high on molk

Yeah, but you don't state the reasons why you don't like him that are invidually related to him. Your only knocks are in comparing him to other players which is the biggest stretch anyone can do. Do they have the same insides (motor, passion, technique, character, instincts, other intangibles)? The easy answer is no.

Shipley... isn't that the guy with the weird looking body type?

[Rabscuttle]

Originally Posted by descendency

As a backup center, I think he'd be OK. Plus, NE loves their developmental lineman. Though, T-Rex arms are not usually "developmental"

Stem cells and broken arms. Insert BB comment here.

[jason96r]

http://www.nfl.com/player/dominicraiola/2504694/profile

Here is the guy I compare Molk to in many ways. I'm both a Michigan and Lions fan. I dislike Raiola quite a bit as he gets ragdolled into the QB too often and doesn't get a push. On the other hand when Molk was injured there was a huge difference in blocking for Michigan.

Both Raiola and Molk have the same build, workout constantly, and play hard. As a Lions fan Raiola may not be my favorite but he has been a starter for years and years.

[P-L]

Originally Posted by Sloopy

Their football arguments go as follows:
1. We have a better overall record

(Counter with 8 out of the last 10)

So the all-time record is irrelevant, but games that happened 5-10 years ago somehow matter?

[bored of education]

I have P. Blake as my number 2 pure C in the draft

[SRogers92]

Originally Posted by jason96r

http://www.nfl.com/player/dominicraiola/2504694/profile

Here is the guy I compare Molk to in many ways. I'm both a Michigan and Lions fan. I dislike Raiola quite a bit as he gets ragdolled into the QB too often and doesn't get a push. On the other hand when Molk was injured there was a huge difference in blocking for Michigan.

Both Raiola and Molk have the same build, workout constantly, and play hard. As a Lions fan Raiola may not be my favorite but he has been a starter for years and years.

When has Molk ever been thrown around, like ever, at all? Raiola is also known to be very soft/weak and Molk is the exact opposite. No offense, but as a Lions/Wolverines fan -- this comparison blows.