Sesame Street MAFIA Game Thread - Grizz (SK) wins!

[ImBrotherCain]

Alright well I am going to be a bit busy tonight I will try to keep up and post when I can.

[RufusMcDaniel]

We might have heard the last of SP for today...it is kind of late for him.

[CashmoneyDrew]

Originally Posted by RufusMcDaniel

We might have heard the last of SP for today...it is kind of late for him.

Meh. I don't buy it. He's almost always on during odd hours.

[Cigaro]

Originally Posted by Bulldogs

It's tough because it wasn't like we actually chose to lynch him, that's when you get the most info as you see who bandwagons on, who jumps in last second, who defends CJ. The russian roulette was really the worst case scenario.

Perhaps I'm just bitter at the fact that I advocated for no lynch yesterday and the one person who did the same ended up dead because the town said no-lynches were pointless, but I feel if you're going to make a case that we lynch someone, anyone for information, you should acknowledge said lynch and discuss it some degree. Only two or three posters have done so so far.

As for Caddy/McGee's point about people who avoided that discussion, I'll do some looking into that.

[Dr. Gonzo]

At work so I can't post much until 11. I am still suspicious of D but I actually think I trust Woot now. Awful that we lost Caddy, he would have helped a lot as watcher.

[Grizzlegom]

Heading out on a three hour drive. I'll follow on my phone and post as much as possible.

That post by D was suspicious to me. Asking investigators to out themselves unless they have concrete evidence is a terrible idea.

[SuperPacker]

Thank **** for that! Finally logged back in.

What do I need to answer for? I'm not evil.

[TheBoyWonder22]

I thought CJ was bad because he was adamantly proposing an action that wouldn't help us at all. Fear is the one thing that always makes people slip up. I'm not sure about Vid, but he had the same justification to lynch CJ as I did so I understand the suspicion.

One thing I saw recently that I don't like is how Grizz briefly suggested there was no SK. I hate when people do that in games like this because it's typically a ploy to take our minds off of the topic.

Lastly, I think it's awfully funny that SP starts going crazy after I accused him of being too normal for his normal day one. In fact that's why I think we should lynch him.

[Cigaro]

Went back and looked at those who didn't comment on the lynch/no lynch debate. The following three users made absolutely no reference to it;

Rufus
IBC
Woot

sbh15- voted both for and against no lynch, both votes based on where he thought the town was going to go
D-Unit- never made any statement about the lynch/no lynch debate, but when wooty revealed, changed his vote to no lynch

SP, TBW- Neither commented themselves on the lynch/no lynch debate, both voted for CJ because they thought CJ's advocacy of no lynch was suspicious

[SuperPacker]

Omg you're spot on TBW! You're just so amazing at Mafia games that I HAD to change my tactics when you called me out!

[SuperPacker]

P.S. I'm basically living off ET atm and for the next 10 weeks, so "it's late in the UK" is a moo point.

[TheBoyWonder22]

Yeah SP, I'm almost on your level...Anyone else think the change is oddly coincidental?

[SuperPacker]

I was kinda drunk. Well I thought I was fine, but apparently not. And then I logged out to stop myself from speaking, tried to log back in, but then failed to log in 5 times and had my account locked. 90 FRUSTRATING minutes later, i'm sober and ready to roll!

[D-Unit]

Originally Posted by Dr. Gonzo

At work so I can't post much until 11. I am still suspicious of D but I actually think I trust Woot now. Awful that we lost Caddy, he would have helped a lot as watcher.

LOL the only reason why I'm suspicious of you is because I voted for you. You do the same thing everytime. Like nobody can be good if they ever vote for you. Gimme a break.

[Cigaro]

I can buy SP's story. Seemed like what one would expect from a drunken SP. TBW, you said day one no lynches don't help the town at all, so what 'help' did getting CJ lynched provide?

[fenikz]

CJ wasn't lynched, it was russian roulette and it brought us no info

[D-Unit]

Originally Posted by Cigaro

Went back and looked at those who didn't comment on the lynch/no lynch debate. The following three users made absolutely no reference to it;

Rufus
IBC
Woot

sbh15- voted both for and against no lynch, both votes based on where he thought the town was going to go
D-Unit- never made any statement about the lynch/no lynch debate, but when wooty revealed, changed his vote to no lynch

SP, TBW- Neither commented themselves on the lynch/no lynch debate, both voted for CJ because they thought CJ's advocacy of no lynch was suspicious

That's right. When I logged on, Shane's time limit was at a near end and with the new wooty reveal, it made sense to go No Lynch rather than keep my lynch on him.. which was only there in the first place because the town was so indecisive and I wanted progress, so I went with the majority of the town's favor at the time.

Whether woot is good, bad or neutral is unsure, but I wasn't ready to lynch him after he proved bulletproof of his claim. I will lean on no lynch over lynching a guy who has a chance of being good.

[D-Unit]

Originally Posted by SuperPacker

P.S. I'm basically living off ET atm and for the next 10 weeks, so "it's late in the UK" is a moo point.

Is that a hint of who you are???

[TheBoyWonder22]

While it didn't directly help, it gave us a shot whereas we just would have lost a watcher night one. At least the way it worked out it let us observe voting patterns. I seriously doubted that we would be unable to come to decision last night so it's wrong to only focus on the people who voted on CJ. That messed up the way day one normally works. CJ actually one had 3 votes so I'm unsure as to why you guys are viewing me as a top suspect. All of my points have been valid to this point.

[SuperPacker]

Originally Posted by D-Unit

Is that a hint of who you are???

[Cigaro]

Originally Posted by TheBoyWonder22

While it didn't directly help, it gave us a shot whereas we just would have lost a watcher night one. At least the way it worked out it let us observe voting patterns. I seriously doubted that we would be unable to come to decision last night so it's wrong to only focus on the people who voted on CJ. That messed up the way day one normally works. CJ actually one had 3 votes so I'm unsure as to why you guys are viewing me as a top suspect. All of my points have been valid to this point.

Gave us a shot at what? And I think I would have preferred to have only lost a watcher night one, rather than both a watcher and a one shot vigilante.

Also since it 'let us observe voting patterns', what are your voting pattern observations?

You're suspicious because you went after SP hard for your first few posts, yet as soon as vidae made his post, you immediately switched to CJ, who was now 'much more suspicious' than SP, despite the fact that you had never mentioned CJ up to that point.

[TheBoyWonder22]

I didn't think CJ was suspicious until he started advocating no-lynch. In fact I thought sbh was much more suspicious at the time, not because he suspected me, but because he thought going no-lynch was a good idea on page 7. I'll have a longer post on voting patterns shortly, I've gotta eat.

[Wootylicous]

TBW is good. Broth is also good.

[Bulldogs]

Originally Posted by Tha Wootster

TBW is good. Broth is also good.

How do you know this? You said your role allowed you to say names.

[Wootylicous]

I found a old piano in broth trash. I assume he is Don Music and TBW is my best friend.