Draftopia Daily News - Game Thread - Mafia Wins!!! - Page 10

Dr. Gonzo · 07-09-2012, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TitanHope

It was a spiteful joke at your expense, so I'm sorry. It's probably more of a sensitive issue than I realize.

I thought it was ******* hilarious. Someone has a guilty conscious haha.

Caddy · 07-09-2012, 07:45 PM

I am against voting for CMD. The dude hasn't posted once. ONCE. He could be a cop, or a tracker, or some other uber role. Let him speak at least. If you still want to lynch him after that, then go for it.

vidae · 07-09-2012, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caddy

Looks like I'll be getting mod killed at some point. The rule should either say it is strictly prohibited, or it is not. Otherwise we will argue non-stop over what role-revealing 'unnecessarily' actually means. Under what situation can I reveal? As the word isn't defined, I see no reason why someone who does role reveal would be mod killed for it. In fact, it would make zero sense if they were.

I could replace you right now if you want.

Brodeur · 07-09-2012, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caddy

I am against voting for CMD. The dude hasn't posted once. ONCE. He could be a cop, or a tracker, or some other uber role. Let him speak at least. If you still want to lynch him after that, then go for it.

I'm just voting in hope that it'll get his attention.

Dr. Gonzo · 07-09-2012, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brodeur

This is literally what I ALWAYS do in the first, ALWAYS.

I always think it is ********. Making others do your dirty work. I don't like it.

Caddy, quit being an asshole. Don't reveal, it's simple. If you plan on getting mod killed just find a replacement.

Caddy · 07-09-2012, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vidae

I could replace you right now if you want.

I just want to know what 'unnecessarily' means. You had to know someone (likely me) would look for a loophole. I always look for loopholes.

vidae · 07-09-2012, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caddy

I just want to know what 'unnecessarily' means. You had to know someone (likely me) would look for a loophole. I always look for loopholes.

If you're about to be lynched it isn't unnecessary. If you're sitting here on day two and go "lols I investigated " then it would ruin the game we set up. It really is that simple.

Brodeur · 07-09-2012, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gonzo

I always think it is ********. Making others do your dirty work. I don't like it.

Caddy, quit being an asshole. Don't reveal, it's simple. If you plan on getting mod killed just find a replacement.

It's just sitting back and watching you argue with someone, more often than not. I still think Cigaro is suspicious, if you want to play it like that. But I'm never a fan of voting for someone so quickly unless it's an inactive and I want to get their attention.

Grizzlegom · 07-09-2012, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caddy

I just want to know what 'unnecessarily' means. You had to know someone (likely me) would look for a loophole. I always look for loopholes.

If anyone has any question on whether they think it is unnecessary or not, they can always PM the mods to ask. There are four of us so it shouldn't take long for one of us to respond. Use your discretion, if you think its unnecessary, it probably is. If you are on the fence about it, just ask us.

Caddy · 07-09-2012, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grizzlegom

If anyone has any question on whether they think it is unnecessary or not, they can always PM the mods to ask. There are four of us so it shouldn't take long for one of us to respond. Use your discretion, if you think its unnecessary, it probably is. If you are on the fence about it, just ask us.

Viddy is getting mad at me in IRC =(

Dr. Gonzo · 07-09-2012, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brodeur

It's just sitting back and watching you argue with someone, more often than not. I still think Cigaro is suspicious, if you want to play it like that. But I'm never a fan of voting for someone so quickly unless it's an inactive and I want to get their attention.

With a 24 hour cap and it getting later we should make a decision relatively soon. I can't do all the heavy lifting. So what you are saying is you are never a fan of voting people early yet you are adamantly for a lynch? Sounds like you want to sit back and watch the town fight it out among ourselves.

vidae · 07-09-2012, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caddy

Viddy is getting mad at me in IRC =(

Because you're acting like a knob. :)

ATLDirtyBirds · 07-09-2012, 07:56 PM

Can Snicho role reveal now mods?

Dr. Gonzo · 07-09-2012, 07:56 PM

Caddy could eat a knob at night.

Dr. Gonzo · 07-09-2012, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATLDirtyBirds

Can Snicho role reveal now mods?

A Snicho reveal is never unnecessary.

Caddy · 07-09-2012, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Gonzo

Caddy could eat a knob at night.

I could, but I won't.

vote Gonzo

Grizzlegom · 07-09-2012, 08:01 PM

Updated Vote Count:

No Lynch (5) - CJ, Cigaro, JR, sbh, broth
Cigaro (3) - Shane, Renji, Forenci
CMD (4) - ATL, Gonzo, TH, Brodeur
Brodeur (1) - D-Unit
Gonzo (1) - Caddy

With 21 alive, 11 are needed for majority.

Gay Ork Wang · 07-09-2012, 08:02 PM

unlynch

Im going to bed.

With my last words before i sleep i curse gonzo

vote gonzo

Dr. Gonzo · 07-09-2012, 08:04 PM

Great reasoning as always gents. I detect jealousy.

sbh15 · 07-09-2012, 08:05 PM

and now we're working backwards. the only person who I have a remote suspicion of right now is D-Unit. he popped in earlier, said he was good and gave a passable reason for not being totally invested. then he votes for Broduer because of a vote for CMD based on his inactivity. based on what I've read, it looks like ATL, Gonzo, and TH did pretty much the same thing. maybe there was something I missed, but why single out one of them specifically? some about his play just strikes me as off thus far.

CJSchneider · 07-09-2012, 08:10 PM

At 245 posts, I am sure every player with a power has enough to base any of there actions on. Why we continue to ponder upon a poor choice escapes me.

Brodeur · 07-09-2012, 08:10 PM

D-Unit always votes me on the first day.

D-Unit · 07-09-2012, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sbh15

and now we're working backwards. the only person who I have a remote suspicion of right now is D-Unit. he popped in earlier, said he was good and gave a passable reason for not being totally invested. then he votes for Broduer because of a vote for CMD based on his inactivity. based on what I've read, it looks like ATL, Gonzo, and TH did pretty much the same thing. maybe there was something I missed, but why single out one of them specifically? some about his play just strikes me as off thus far.

Because what you need to watch out for are guys who will make a move to jump on board a lynch train. You don't get too curious about the 1st and 2nd guys to vote, but once it starts to move, you watch who's willing to do it... and you watch for their reason.

When I've seen Brodeur be good, he's always been really cautious of who he's voting for. He usually needs really solid evidence. So this stuck out to me.

D-Unit · 07-09-2012, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brodeur

D-Unit always votes me on the first day.

That's completely made up and untrue. The only thing this is telling me is that you are starting to panic. I can't remember one game where this was true. ...and you couldn't find one either.

Dr. Gonzo · 07-09-2012, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caddy

I am against voting for CMD. The dude hasn't posted once. ONCE. He could be a cop, or a tracker, or some other uber role. Let him speak at least. If you still want to lynch him after that, then go for it.

Anybody could be anything. Posting has nothing to do with it. This reminds me of when I defended Forenci in the Sesame Street game. We were both evil.