SWDC Mafia Game Thread (Town Wins!)

[vikes_28]

Originally Posted by jballa838

Hey vikes, do you cheat at Madden?

if you go by the logic of this:



Then yes. I do. Have I? No.

[Dr. Gonzo]

Originally Posted by Todd Bertuzzi

Hmm I have never seen Gonzo stick up for anyone in these games before...

If vikes is indeed MJE/SABF/Chris I feel like that might be a good safeclaim for the mafia to have.

Really, you have never seen me advocate against lynching someone who I didn't think we should lynch? I do it at least once a game. Get your facts straight.

Now I do think your second point is intriguing, it would be a good safe claim. That said, I am not sure we should lynch him based on thinking Chris would be a good safe claim.

[RufusMcDaniel]

Originally Posted by jrdrylie

Nah, I rather enjoy being in your ass.

[Rob S]

My God am I hammertimed. Anyway, I'll catch up in the AM. The Bills win, so no changing NFL teams for me!

[Todd Bertuzzi]

Originally Posted by Dr. Gonzo

Really, you have never seen me advocate against lynching someone who I didn't think we should lynch? I do it at least once a game. Get your facts straight.

Now I do think your second point is intriguing, it would be a good safe claim. That said, I am not sure we should lynch him based on thinking Chris would be a good safe claim.

I agree but I'm not so sure he's even Chris(or is the socks and jersey thing a dead giveaway?). vikes is being shady and as much as we would probably enjoy this game so much more without him...

Unvote: vikes
Vote: No Lynch

[SuperMcGee]

We certainly should not lynch anyone based on who could be a safe claim. Could be anybody.

unvote: vikes

His death won't erase that image.

[Dr. Gonzo]

In the spirit of the poster who I will be embodying this game

Vote: No Lynch

[vikes_28]

Originally Posted by Rob S

My God am I hammertimed. Anyway, I'll catch up in the AM. The Bills win, so no changing NFL teams for me!

Please tell me this is auto-corrected

[Rob S]

btw....**** you guys for 13 pages already. ugh.

[vikes_28]

Originally Posted by SuperMcGee

His death won't erase that image.

[Rob S]

Originally Posted by vikes_28

Please tell me this is auto-corrected

you suck vikes. are you really criticizing me?

[vikes_28]

Originally Posted by Rob S

btw....**** you guys for 13 pages already. ugh.

<3 you rob. Sweet dreams.

[OSUGiants17]

vote: no lynch

[Brothgar]

Has it been the same set of people trying to get a lynch train going?

[Forenci]

I'm sort of debating whether not No Lynch makes more or less sense with so many people.

[BeerBaron]

Originally Posted by Forenci

I'm sort of debating whether not No Lynch makes more or less sense with so many people.

I think less, but I'm always against it anyway. We'll probably use 35 of our 36 hours and then decide to do it. Standard day 1 fare.

[Gay Ork Wang]

....

again:

Jbond said that he assigned everyone the names of good people. Then he randomed the bad people and assigned them a good person RANDOMLY. There is absolutely no reason to think that one name is more likely to be a safe claim for evil cause it is all randomized.

[Dr. Gonzo]

Originally Posted by BeerBaron

I think less, but I'm always against it anyway. We'll probably use 35 of our 36 hours and then decide to do it. Standard day 1 fare.

Any suggestions then?

[Dr. Gonzo]

Originally Posted by *** Ork Wang

....

again:

Jbond said that he assigned everyone the names of good people. Then he randomed the bad people and assigned them a good person RANDOMLY. There is absolutely no reason to think that one name is more likely to be a safe claim for evil cause it is all randomized.

I think we already came to this conclusion.

[BeerBaron]

Originally Posted by Dr. Gonzo

Any suggestions then?

Lynching the last person to post (or whoever doesn't post) is something I can get behind that we've done before. Especially since it seems like everyone has a required daily tic to fulfill. If we let someone go a day without posting, it may be harder to verify/confirm claims later on.

Everyone has known when the game was going to start for a while now. There is no excuse to not have shown up and posted something by now.

It's not an earth shattering idea, but if anyone has one of those, I'm up for hearing it.

[Caddy]

It's pretty well known that I'm an advocate for Day 1 lynchings. As nobody will be stupid enough to reveal themselves as evil, I suggest we lynch somebody who is likely to contribute very little to the thread. I can't stand the inactives that take up space and do little else but vote.

[Dr. Gonzo]

Originally Posted by Caddy

It's pretty well known that I'm an advocate for Day 1 lynchings. As nobody will be stupid enough to reveal themselves as evil, I suggest we lynch somebody who is likely to contribute very little to the thread. I can't stand the inactives that take up space and do little else but vote.

As much as I would like to remain a vote for no lynch I can very much get behind this. Lynching someone who we think will lay low all game and not help us. Either gets rid of someone evil or someone good who would have coasted anyway.

[Todd Bertuzzi]

Going through the first post RoP's probably the only person I would include in that category.

[Jensen]

Originally Posted by Dr. Gonzo

As much as I would like to remain a vote for no lynch I can very much get behind this. Lynching someone who we think will lay low all game and not help us. Either gets rid of someone evil or someone good who would have coasted anyway.

and you can assume who these people will be based off of day one how...

[Dr. Gonzo]

Originally Posted by Jensen

and you can assume who these people will be based off of day one how...

You really can't. I mean you can make an educated guess based on past performances in these games but after looking over the list I would can't really single out one person.