Defense

[Green Bay Scat]

Its all about 3-3-5. (2) 6'4" 240lbs DE, (1) 6'1" 300lbs NT, (2) 6'1" 225lbs OLB, (1) 6' 240lbs MLB, (2) 5'9" 170lbs CB, (2) 5'11" 195lbs Studs(SS), (1) 6'1" 205lbs Gaucho(FS)

[iworshipbender]

4-4 cover 3

[elway777]

Well 3-4 defenses are hard to run in high school and pop warner because its hard finding the guys big enough to anchor the line,.....id go with traditional 4-3,the kids will learn the system easier and youll most likely be able to get kids around that size range.

[Green Bay Scat]

Originally Posted by elway777

Well 3-4 defenses are hard to run in high school and pop warner because its hard finding the guys big enough to anchor the line,.....id go with traditional 4-3,the kids will learn the system easier and youll most likely be able to get kids around that size range.

less u played for mission in 04 or your a long beach poly guy...

[elway777]

Originally Posted by Green Bay Scat

less u played for mission in 04 or your a long beach poly guy...

yup then we can have any player we want :D

[Green Bay Scat]

Originally Posted by elway777

yup then we can have any player we want :D

you bastards, u fking BASTARDS!

[ny10804]

My HS team has such an elaborate defense. There's an Anchor (strong side DE), Monster (strong side DE), DT (weakside DT), DE (weakside DE), Mike (strong side ILB), Eagle (strongside ILB), Stud (weakside LB/DE), Rambo (free safety), Forced Corner (strong side CB/LB), Close Corner (weakside CB), and Safety.

It looks kinda like this

---------------------2
--------------------QB----SL
X ---------- Y T G C G T ------------X
--------------A--M--DT--DE--S
--FC------------E----M------------CC
------------R---------------S

Bear with me on the drawing.

[VikesRule]

I like the 3-4 for video games, but in real life I'd expect the 4-2-5 or 3-3-5 to be the best bet.

[Green Bay Scat]

3-3-5 should be use more often, because High Schoolers are getting more athletic but not as big. its good to have the fat guys in front and let the "Playmakers" make plays

[draftguru151]

Originally Posted by ny10804

My HS team has such an elaborate defense. There's an Anchor (strong side DE), Monster (strong side DE), DT (weakside DT), DE (weakside DE), Mike (strong side ILB), Eagle (strongside ILB), Stud (weakside LB/DE), Rambo (free safety), Forced Corner (strong side CB/LB), Close Corner (weakside CB), and Safety.

It looks kinda like this

---------------------2
--------------------QB----SL
X ---------- Y T G C G T ------------X
--------------A--M--DT--DE--S
--FC------------E----M------------CC
------------R---------------S

Bear with me on the drawing.

That is kinda odd with more people on the weakside than strongside. Here is what my team's looks like. S is stud (DE/OLB). Mike and Will ILBs, WT is Walt, which is a SS/OLB.


---------------------2
--------------------QB----SL
X ---------- Y T G C G T ------------X
------------S--DT--NT--DE
CB--------------M----W------------CB
------------SS--------------WT
--------------------FS

[ny10804]

Originally Posted by draftguru151

That is kinda odd with more people on the weakside than strongside. Here is what my team's looks like. S is stud (DE/OLB). Mike and Will ILBs, WT is Walt, which is a SS/OLB.


---------------------2
--------------------QB----SL
X ---------- Y T G C G T ------------X
------------S--DT--NT--DE
CB--------------M----W------------CB
------------SS--------------WT
--------------------FS

The 'strong' side for us is the side with the TE. The Mike group (the Mike, Stud, Anchor, Monster, and Forced Corner) is always opposite the TE. I messed up the way I named them, but the drawing is right.

Our defenses are fairly similar.

[ATLDirtyBirds]

4-3