Buffalo Bills Discussion - Page 112

Rob S · 04-11-2009, 10:15 AM

I will say tho......the option of pairing Roscoe with with Peters and a later round selection for a top 6 pick this year could be an interesting option. That way we could maybe do something like Rak and Oher, Curry and Oher, or Smith and Brown if the Rams bit.

SuperMcGee · 04-11-2009, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob S

as much as I love Roscoe......we don't need him. Reed is better in the slot and I want to see Leodis on PR duty. If we can squeeze a 3rd that would be pretty sweet, but I am expecting a 4th which is decent value I guess.

I'd say we could have 4 receivers who are better than Roscoe as it is and another with a boatload of potential. He has had slight issues. McKelvin and even Freddy would still give us a great punt return, but I'd hate to lose the guy who could very well be the best PR in the league when we're a team that is so reliant on getting huge contributuons from our special teams. Our offense has been pathetic for years and we can't afford to lose the field position battle. McKelvin should be a really good returner there, but I wouldn't be so sure that they want to give him every opportunity.
I would dish Roscoe for a decent price, but you hate to part with anyone who is the best at what they do.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob S

I will say tho......the option of pairing Roscoe with with Peters and a later round selection for a top 6 pick this year could be an interesting option. That way we could maybe do something like Rak and Oher, Curry and Oher, or Smith and Brown if the Rams bit.

Wouldn't be enough for a pick like that.

ruthlessrussian · 04-11-2009, 10:50 PM

[quote=Wouldn't be enough for a pick like that.[/QUOTE]

For a potentially elite LT that is already proven? Im pretty sure there will be some teams interested in the top 10 of the draft if it comes down to trading Peters.

Didn't the Bills trade a 9th overall for a backup QB back in the day?? It would be nice if we could somewhat make up for that.

Bills2083 · 04-12-2009, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperMcgee

I'd say we could have 4 receivers who are better than Roscoe as it is and another with a boatload of potential. He has had slight issues. McKelvin and even Freddy would still give us a great punt return, but I'd hate to lose the guy who could very well be the best PR in the league when we're a team that is so reliant on getting huge contributuons from our special teams. Our offense has been pathetic for years and we can't afford to lose the field position battle. McKelvin should be a really good returner there, but I wouldn't be so sure that they want to give him every opportunity.
I would dish Roscoe for a decent price, but you hate to part with anyone who is the best at what they do.

Wouldn't be enough for a pick like that.

I really don't want to trade Parrish.
I still feel that we aren't using him correctly. He is so shift, and can break an unlimited amount of tackles, but we still don't put the ball in his hands enough. They should have more go routes with him, screens, slants, anything that will allow him to use his quickness and great cutting abilities to his advantage.

Rob S · 04-15-2009, 08:16 AM

We knew we going to have a tough schedule.......and we know schedules are overrated. That said.....I think having the Colts last could be huge.......seeing as we may be battling it out and they could have everything locked up.

SuperMcGee · 04-15-2009, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob S

We knew we going to have a tough schedule.......and we know schedules are overrated. That said.....I think having the Colts last could be huge.......seeing as we may be battling it out and they could have everything locked up.

They took the Jets game. You should know, that is a game you just don't take away!

Rob S · 04-15-2009, 07:39 PM

Yeah, thats pretty g a y.......

fischbowl · 04-15-2009, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperMcgee

They took the Jets game. You should know, that is a game you just don't take away!

I know how ****** up is that? Hopefully our tickets will be selected for Toronto doubt it though.

SuperKevin · 04-17-2009, 12:35 PM

So looks like Peters will be traded to Philly sometime soon. I hope we can get a 1st round pick out of it.

bored of education · 04-17-2009, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperKevin

So looks like Peters will be traded to Philly sometime soon. I hope we can get a 1st round pick out of it.

I think a 1st will come of this for sure. Then what does Buff do?

DE and Mack or what?

Rob S · 04-17-2009, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bored of education

I think a 1st will come of this for sure. Then what does Buff do?

DE and Mack or what?

DE and Pettigrew/Oher......look Mack/Unger in round 2. That would be my plan anyway.

Malaka · 04-17-2009, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bored of education

I think a 1st will come of this for sure. Then what does Buff do?

DE and Mack or what?

Probably depends which 1st they get...

I can see at 21. them selecting Pettigrew.

At 28. Pettigrew if he is still there, but if not definitely Mack.

11. is still a huge question mark, but I'd guess they'd take a DE, that'd probably be their best bet.

Bills2083 · 04-17-2009, 12:43 PM

per pfw it is for the 28th overall pick, as long as a 2nd-day pick, and late 2010 pick.

SuperKevin · 04-17-2009, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bored of education

I think a 1st will come of this for sure. Then what does Buff do?

DE and Mack or what?

I think we'd go for a guy like Oher with our 1st pick and then best available DE later on.

bored of education · 04-17-2009, 12:50 PM

**** how about this!

1. pettigrew
1b. everette bronw/ayers/English (if they were to drop ;))
2. eric wood/unger

coordinator0 · 04-17-2009, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperKevin

I think we'd go for a guy like Oher with our 1st pick and then best available DE later on.

I smell Larry English at 28...

Bills2083 · 04-17-2009, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bored of education

**** how about this!

1. pettigrew
1b. everette bronw/ayers/English (if they were to drop ;))
2. eric wood/unger

What do we do at LT?

Rob S · 04-17-2009, 12:56 PM

21 would make this way sweeter.........I still like it tho. Maybe we still try to trade down from 11?

SuperKevin · 04-17-2009, 12:58 PM

I think we go like this

1. Michael Oher (athletic OL who i feel is similar to Peters. I don't like him nearly as much though)
1b. Alex Mack
2. Michael Johnson
3. Richard Quinn

bored of education · 04-17-2009, 12:59 PM

Oh yeah LT duhhh

Oher at number 11 then

ChiFan24 · 04-17-2009, 01:02 PM

#11 + #42 for #4 (Eugene Monroe)?

coordinator0 · 04-17-2009, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiFan24

#11 + #42 for #4 (Eugene Monroe)?

That's probably not enough to move up, but i could see them attempting it.

SuperKevin · 04-17-2009, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiFan24

#11 + #42 for #4 (Eugene Monroe)?

It'd more likely have to be #11 and #28 with a 4th rounder thrown in to move into the top 5

bored of education · 04-17-2009, 01:08 PM

Even though Peters had a rough year they got some very good value for him.

Bills2083 · 04-17-2009, 01:11 PM

So, if we were to do that trade (11/28/4th) for #4...

1.) Eugene Monroe - OT
2.) Michael Johnson - DE
3.) Andy Levitre - OG
4.) Tyrone McKenzie - OLB (I have this 4th in here assuming that the 2nd day pick we received from Philly is a 4th)

thoughts?