|
|
| Denver Broncos Team Forum Discuss the Broncos |
01-15-2011, 12:20 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 744
Reputation: 57608
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crossroads
A workhorse? He's only had more than 250 carries once, and only over 200 carries in a season twice. He's only had 841 carries in 5 seasons. He's been far from run down.
|
969 carries in college as well.
He's reaching the age when most running backs break down. Add in the fact that we are going to have to pay him a good deal to come...
I rather get a cheaper/younger guy in FA or the draft.
Last edited by DBNYDP : 01-15-2011 at 12:40 PM.
|
|
|
|   Sponsored Advertisement |
|   Remove Ads By Signing Up for an Account! |
|
01-15-2011, 08:31 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
ಠ_ಠ
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,204
Reputation: 3844238
|
??? he'll be 28 when the season starts (if it starts). i'd rather take three productive years out of a proven running back than let xanders draft another one. because that worked out well.
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 01:41 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 744
Reputation: 57608
|
He'll cost too much. Hightower will be cheaper.
McDermott is the new DC prob.
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 03:51 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
ಠ_ಠ
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,204
Reputation: 3844238
|
and hightower is substantially worse. as much as i, too , would like us to sign numerous veterans who will contribute nothing...
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 04:24 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 862
Reputation: 85849
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by njx9
i'm guessing this makes bowers the pick and pretty well eliminates the peterson/dareus argument.
|
I think I at the point now where I would be happy with Fairley or Bowers. This is still a bad year to get the second pick, but I think these are the two guys most worth taking a punt on based on where we are. Everyone else would be a bad idea in my mind.
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 06:48 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
ಠ_ಠ
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,204
Reputation: 3844238
|
i'm still on peterson. i think he's clearly the BPA in the draft, and when you need talent at every position on defense....
that said, if we shift to a 43 look, i'm ok with bowers or fairley. i don't like either in a 34 look.
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 06:57 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 385
Reputation: 9726
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timbathia
I think I at the point now where I would be happy with Fairley or Bowers. This is still a bad year to get the second pick, but I think these are the two guys most worth taking a punt on based on where we are. Everyone else would be a bad idea in my mind.
|
agreed with taking fairley or bowers, but i think this is far from a bad year to have the second overall pick. imagine if we were in the same situation, except replace this year's class with the class of '09. that would defnitely be a no-win situation.
__________________
Now the only ones I take are the ones that I wear
Ain't takin no shorts no more
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 07:00 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 385
Reputation: 9726
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by njx9
i'm still on peterson. i think he's clearly the BPA in the draft, and when you need talent at every position on defense....
that said, if we shift to a 43 look, i'm ok with bowers or fairley. i don't like either in a 34 look.
|
i think it's pretty much a given that we'll switch to a 43, considering fox's background and our reported interest in mora and mcdermott
__________________
Now the only ones I take are the ones that I wear
Ain't takin no shorts no more
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 07:02 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Moderator
All-NFLDC
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: KO-V>O-V
Posts: 14,845
Reputation: 1045330
|
I'd be happy with either PP or Fairley. Disappointed with anyone else. Also I don't mind the move to the 4-3 much at all. If you look at our front 7, it's probly gonna benefit both DJ Williams and Robert Ayers. It's gonna hurt Doom, but only slightly, as he's proven he can get the sacks any way he wants. Yeah he'll suffer in run support, but as of now, so will our entire D so whatever.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Wright
Terrellezzzzzzzz Pryorzzzzzzzz!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by njx9
do i tell you when to flip the burger?
|
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 07:03 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
ಠ_ಠ
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,204
Reputation: 3844238
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cunningham
i think it's pretty much a given that we'll switch to a 43, considering fox's background and our reported interest in mora and mcdermott
|
all reports i've seen indicate that we'll stick with a 34 flavor, but that it'll be more of a hybrid (doom will have his hand in the dirt at times).
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 01:47 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,746
Reputation: 136416
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by njx9
all reports i've seen indicate that we'll stick with a 34 flavor, but that it'll be more of a hybrid (doom will have his hand in the dirt at times).
|
We kept Nunnelly as DL coach, which is a signal that the 3-4 will still be in effect to some degree. Other coaching appointments:
OC - Mike McCoy
OL - Dave Magazu
TE - Clancy Barone
RB - Eric Studesville
WR - Tyke Tolbert
Off Quality Control - Brian Callahan
DL - Wayne Nunnelly
Def Quality Control - Jay Rodgers
Jim Skipper (RB, Running game coordinator in Carolina) is rumored to be coming (maybe AHC?) and from what I've heard it sounds like Adam Gase will move from WR's to QB coach. Both would be good moves.
DC looks to be either McDermott from Philly or Mora Jr. Either one is significantly more legit than Wink.
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 02:45 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 395
Reputation: 112824
|
I really don't like McDermott, but I imagine he'd be running John Fox's schemes and not his own, so it might not be too bad. Also it should be noted that Magazu is a zone blocking guy, so it looks like we'll be a zone blocking team again.
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 03:21 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,746
Reputation: 136416
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crossroads
I really don't like McDermott, but I imagine he'd be running John Fox's schemes and not his own, so it might not be too bad.
|
No question that Fox will strongly influence the D, which would probably be good for a young guy like McDermott. We'll see how it plays out.
Quote:
|
Also it should be noted that Magazu is a zone blocking guy, so it looks like we'll be a zone blocking team again.
|
Carolina has run a mix of things the last few years. However, I believe Fox mentioned the return of a strong zone approach during one of his media sessions. I think that's a good thing. Not so much zone running, but the focus on doing a few things well. Commit to a certain approach. Repetition helps execution. This was an area of weakness under McD. Hopefully that will change.
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 03:24 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 385
Reputation: 9726
|
sorry for being out of the loop on this, but does anyone know how free agency will work with the current cba issues? will there be any signings before a new one is worked out?
__________________
Now the only ones I take are the ones that I wear
Ain't takin no shorts no more
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 04:10 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 862
Reputation: 85849
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crossroads
I really don't like McDermott, but I imagine he'd be running John Fox's schemes and not his own, so it might not be too bad. Also it should be noted that Magazu is a zone blocking guy, so it looks like we'll be a zone blocking team again.
|
McDermott gone to Carolina.
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 10:37 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: A mile higher than you
Posts: 904
Reputation: 59980
|
Denver Post is reporting that Jim Mora will likely be named the new DC.
__________________

WELCOME REALITY
|
|
|
01-18-2011, 02:38 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,746
Reputation: 136416
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cunningham
sorry for being out of the loop on this, but does anyone know how free agency will work with the current cba issues? will there be any signings before a new one is worked out?
|
My understanding (which may be flawed) is that there is basically no trading of players or unrestricted FA until a new CBA is in place.
|
|
|
01-18-2011, 08:16 AM
|
(permalink)
|
|
ಠ_ಠ
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,204
Reputation: 3844238
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diehard
My understanding (which may be flawed) is that there is basically no trading of players or unrestricted FA until a new CBA is in place.
|
pretty sure this is correct. teams can only trade draft picks for draft picks.
|
|
|
01-18-2011, 07:48 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
DC Administrator
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 54,481
Reputation: 1633167
|
What do you guys think of Amakumara?
|
|
|
01-18-2011, 08:10 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
ಠ_ಠ
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,204
Reputation: 3844238
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Unit
What do you guys think of Amakumara?
|
thumbs down. i was really underwhelmed in every nebraska game i saw. if we go DB in the first, it should be peterson. i'd like amukamara's value around 20-25. *shrug*
|
|
|
01-19-2011, 01:15 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,569
Reputation: -17613
|
But Amukamara has been nothing but a shutdown corner for Nebraska this year. How can you not be impressed by him?
|
|
|
01-19-2011, 01:20 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
ಠ_ಠ
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,204
Reputation: 3844238
|
because he hasn't been anything close to shutdown in any game i've seen him play in. he's played from behind receivers, he hasn't made plays that a top corner should make, he's looked... stiff, i guess? that's not the right word for what i'm thinking of.
i'm pretty sure jimmy posted some stuff a few pages back with a better description.
|
|
|
01-23-2011, 08:56 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 862
Reputation: 85849
|
it may be a long time before we get a DC if we wait around to talk to Trgovac.
|
|
|
01-23-2011, 09:00 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 395
Reputation: 112824
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timbathia
it may be a long time before we get a DC if we wait around to talk to Trgovac.
|
Can't they talk to coaches on the superbowl teams during the bye week this week?
|
|
|
01-23-2011, 09:09 PM
|
(permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 862
Reputation: 85849
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crossroads
Can't they talk to coaches on the superbowl teams during the bye week this week?
|
Not completely sure of the rules, but I definitely read on espn that we have to wait until the Packers season is over.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 PM.
|